These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 722255)

  • 1. Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access.
    Carr TH; Davidson BJ; Hawkins HL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Nov; 4(4):674-90. PubMed ID: 722255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task modulates ERP effects of orthographic neighborhood for pseudowords but not words.
    Meade G; Grainger J; Holcomb PJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():385-396. PubMed ID: 30797831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthographic regularity, lexical status, and letter-identification acuity.
    Hershenson M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Oct; 55(2):635-47. PubMed ID: 7155759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How do Scrabble players encode letter position during reading?
    Perea M; Marcet A; Gómez P
    Psicothema; 2016; 28(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 26820417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The acronym superiority effect.
    Laszlo S; Federmeier KD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Dec; 14(6):1158-63. PubMed ID: 18229490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform.
    Coch D; Mitra P
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1329():159-74. PubMed ID: 20211607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional MRI evidence for an abstract, not perceptual, word-form area.
    Polk TA; Farah MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Mar; 131(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11900104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Better the DVL you know: acronyms reveal the contribution of familiarity to single-word reading.
    Laszlo S; Federmeier KD
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Feb; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 17425530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. List constituency and orthographic and phonological processing: a shift to high familiarity words from low familiarity words.
    Rutherford BJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():74-81. PubMed ID: 25455570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Word and pseudoword superiority effects in a shallow orthography language: the role of hemispheric lateralization.
    Ripamonti E; Traficante D; Crippa F; Luzzattii C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Apr; 118(2):411-28. PubMed ID: 24897877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity to orthographic familiarity in the occipito-temporal region.
    Bruno JL; Zumberge A; Manis FR; Lu ZL; Goldman JG
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1988-2001. PubMed ID: 18180168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthographic and feature-level contributions to letter identification.
    Lally C; Rastle K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 May; 76(5):1111-1119. PubMed ID: 35619235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word and pseudoword superiority effects on letter position processing in developing and skilled readers.
    Kezilas Y; Kohnen S; McKague M; Robidoux S; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1989-2002. PubMed ID: 27732042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area.
    Cohen L; Lehéricy S; Chochon F; Lemer C; Rivaud S; Dehaene S
    Brain; 2002 May; 125(Pt 5):1054-69. PubMed ID: 11960895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthography and familiarity effects in word processing.
    Carr TH; Posner MI; Pollatsek A; Snyder CR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Dec; 108(4):389-414. PubMed ID: 528909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Early Does the Brain Distinguish between Regular Words, Irregular Words, and Pseudowords during the Reading Process? Evidence from Neurochronometric TMS.
    Pattamadilok C; Bulnes LC; Devlin JT; Bourguignon M; Morais J; Goldman S; Kolinsky R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 27(6):1259-74. PubMed ID: 25603024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Steady state visual evoked potentials in reading aloud: Effects of lexicality, frequency and orthographic familiarity.
    Montani V; Chanoine V; Stoianov IP; Grainger J; Ziegler JC
    Brain Lang; 2019 May; 192():1-14. PubMed ID: 30826643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonological-orthographic consistency for Japanese words and its impact on visual and auditory word recognition.
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Miyamura S; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):126-146. PubMed ID: 27808550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.