These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7224976)

  • 1. Rise time of pure-tone stimuli in brain stem response audiometry.
    Suzuki T; Horiuchi K
    Audiology; 1981; 20(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 7224976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory brainstem responses to middle- and low-frequency tone pips.
    Maurizi M; Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Rosignoli M
    Audiology; 1984; 23(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 6704061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On-effect in brainstem electric response audiometry. Consequences for the use of tone-bursts.
    Debruyne F; Forrez G
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1982; 44(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 7070793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brainstem electrical responses from selected tone pip stimuli.
    Wood MH; Seitz MR; Jacobson JT
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 528293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of tone-burst frequency on fast and slow components of auditory brain-stem response.
    Takagi N; Suzuki T; Kobayashi K
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 4023602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory nerve and brain stem volume-conducted potentials evoked by pure-tone pips in the CBA/J laboratory mouse.
    Henry KR
    Audiology; 1979; 18(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 435177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brainstem wave V latencies to tone pip stimuli.
    Weber BA; Folsom RC
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(5):182-4. PubMed ID: 856779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Portions of tone pips contributing to frequency-selective auditory brain stem responses.
    Kodera K; Marsh RR; Suzuki M; Suzuki J
    Audiology; 1983; 22(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 6870663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Brain stem audiometry and unconventional audiometry in small children--a comparison with pure-tone audiometry performed at a later time].
    Jensen JH; Ostri BJ
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Apr; 153(15):1055-7. PubMed ID: 2024330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural interaction in human auditory brainstem response compared for tone-pips and rectangular clicks under conditions of auditory and visual attention.
    Ikeda K
    Hear Res; 2015 Jul; 325():27-34. PubMed ID: 25776741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic brainstem responses for clinical use: a comparison of pure tone stimuli with wide band clicks.
    Davis AE; Barnard S; Beagley HA
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1985 Oct; 10(5):243-7. PubMed ID: 4075548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency specificity and on-effect in brainstem electric response audiometry.
    Debruyne F
    J Otolaryngol; 1982 Aug; 11(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 7131639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interaural attenuation using etymotic ER-3A insert earphones in auditory brain stem response testing.
    Van Campen LE; Sammeth CA; Peek BF
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 2307307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Investigation on the frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem response to tone burst in three different conditions].
    Wang S; Chen X; Ye Yf; Pan Sf
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jul; 16(7):330-3. PubMed ID: 15510729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
    Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram.
    Gorga MP; Worthington DW; Reiland JK; Beauchaine KA; Goldgar DE
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 3996784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem response protocol.
    Swanepoel D; Schmulian D; Hugo R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Jan; 124(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 14977080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Slow brain stem responses (SN10) to tone pips in normally hearing newborns and adults.
    Hawes MD; Greenberg HJ
    Audiology; 1981; 20(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 7224977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.