These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7226073)
1. Radiation detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Dodd GD Cancer; 1981 Apr; 47(7):1766-9. PubMed ID: 7226073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine. Autier P; Boniol M Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer. Ringash J; CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical developments in mammography. Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG; Jong RA Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):599-611. PubMed ID: 18849694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current perspectives on indications and limitations of mammography. Pope TL J Fam Pract; 1983 Mar; 16(3):481-5. PubMed ID: 6827227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefit to Radiation Risk of Breast-specific Gamma Imaging Compared with Mammography in Screening Asymptomatic Women with Dense Breasts. Hendrick RE; Tredennick T Radiology; 2016 Nov; 281(2):583-588. PubMed ID: 27257949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developments in mammography. Wolfe JN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Feb; 124(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 174430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study. Miglioretti DL; Lange J; van den Broek JJ; Lee CI; van Ravesteyn NT; Ritley D; Kerlikowske K; Fenton JJ; Melnikow J; de Koning HJ; Hubbard RA Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 26756460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of the radiation dose and assessment of the risk in mammography screening for early detection of cancer of the breast, in Israel. Broisman A; Schlesinger T; Alfassi ZB Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jan; 143(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 21068021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mammography and radiation risk]. Jung H Rofo; 1998 Oct; 169(4):336-43. PubMed ID: 9819644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiologic detection of breast cancer. Review and recommendations. Sadowsky NL; Kalisher L; White G; Ferrucci JT N Engl J Med; 1976 Feb; 294(7):370-3. PubMed ID: 1246289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Stomper PC; Gelman RS Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Present status of thermography, ultrasound and mammography in breast cancer detection. Dodd GD Cancer; 1977 Jun; 39(6 Suppl):2796-805. PubMed ID: 872067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance? Beemsterboer PM; Warmerdam PG; Boer R; de Koning HJ J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 9718526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Method of tumor detection influences disease-free survival of women with breast carcinoma. Senie RT; Lesser M; Kinne DW; Rosen PP Cancer; 1994 Mar; 73(6):1666-72. PubMed ID: 8156494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation risk of breast screening in England with digital mammography. Warren LM; Dance DR; Young KC Br J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 89(1067):20150897. PubMed ID: 27585843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]