These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7226660)

  • 1. Radiographic and morphologic studies of load-bearing porous-surfaced structured implants.
    Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Welsh RP; Binnington AG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1981 May; (156):249-57. PubMed ID: 7226660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants.
    Pilliar RM; Lee JM; Maniatopoulos C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Jul; (208):108-13. PubMed ID: 3720113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of load alteration on the biological and biomechanical performance of a titanium fiber-metal segmental prosthesis.
    Heck DA; Nakajima I; Kelly PJ; Chao EY
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1986 Jan; 68(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 3941113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Threaded versus porous-surfaced designs for implant stabilization in bone-endodontic implant model.
    Maniatopoulos C; Pilliar RM; Smith DC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1986; 20(9):1309-33. PubMed ID: 3782184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The susceptibility of smooth implant surfaces to periimplant fibrosis and migration of polyethylene wear debris.
    Bobyn JD; Jacobs JJ; Tanzer M; Urban RM; Aribindi R; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Brooks CE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Feb; (311):21-39. PubMed ID: 7634577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of soft tissue ingrowth into canine porous coated femoral implants designed for osteosarcomas management.
    LaBerge M; Bobyn JD; Rivard CH; Drouin G; Duval P
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Jul; 24(7):959-71. PubMed ID: 2398080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions.
    Søballe K; Hansen ES; B-Rasmussen H; Jørgensen PH; Bünger C
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Mar; 10(2):285-99. PubMed ID: 1311039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Porous polysulfone coatings for fixation of femoral stems by bony ingrowth.
    Spector M; Davis RJ; Lunceford EM; Harmon SL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Jun; (176):34-41. PubMed ID: 6851340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of biocompatible osteoconductive polymer as an orthopedic implant in dogs.
    Trevor PB; Stevenson S; Carrig CB; Waldron DR; Smith MM
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Jun; 200(11):1651-60. PubMed ID: 1624340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions.
    Jasty M; Bragdon C; Burke D; O'Connor D; Lowenstein J; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 May; 79(5):707-14. PubMed ID: 9160943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of estrogen deficiency on the growth of tissue into porous titanium implants.
    Martin RB; Paul HA; Bargar WL; Dannucci GA; Sharkey NA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1988 Apr; 70(4):540-7. PubMed ID: 3356721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Porous ingrowth fixation of the femoral component in a canine surface replacement of the hip.
    Hedley AK; Clarke IC; Kozinn SC; Coster I; Gruen T; Amstutz HC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Mar; (163):300-11. PubMed ID: 7067265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of proximally and fully porous-coated canine hip stem design on bone modeling.
    Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Binnington AG; Szivek JA
    J Orthop Res; 1987; 5(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 3305844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Powder metal-made orthopedic implants with porous surface for fixation by tissue ingrowth.
    Pilliar RM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Jun; (176):42-51. PubMed ID: 6851341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance of peak value and duration of the interfacial shear load in evaluation of the bone-implant interface.
    Chang YS; Kobayashi M; Li ZL; Oka M; Nakamura T
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Oct; 18(8):773-9. PubMed ID: 12957565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Porous-surfaced metallic implants for orthopedic applications.
    Pilliar RM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Apr; 21(A1 Suppl):1-33. PubMed ID: 3553195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hip arthroplasty with a Moore prosthesis with porous coating. A five-year study.
    Engh CA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Jun; (176):52-66. PubMed ID: 6851342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of pore size on the peel strength of attachment of fibrous tissue to porous-surfaced implants.
    Bobyn JD; Wilson GJ; MacGregor DC; Pilliar RM; Weatherly GC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Sep; 16(5):571-84. PubMed ID: 7130213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone allograft and implant fixation tested under influence of bio-burden reduction, periosteal augmentation and topical antibiotics. Animal experimental studies.
    Barckman J
    Dan Med J; 2014 Jan; 61(1):B4720. PubMed ID: 24393592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interface mechanics and bone growth into porous Co-Cr-Mo alloy implants.
    Cook SD; Walsh KA; Haddad RJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1985 Mar; (193):271-80. PubMed ID: 3971631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.