These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7228699)
1. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers: ICRP Publication 30. Vennart J Health Phys; 1981 Apr; 40(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 7228699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ICRP Publication 119: Compendium of dose coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60. ; Eckerman K; Harrison J; Menzel HG; Clement CH Ann ICRP; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():1-130. PubMed ID: 23025851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Doses to the embryo and fetus from intakes of radionuclides by the mother. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP; 2001; 31(1-3):19-515. PubMed ID: 11730884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 1990. Mountford PJ; Temperton DH Eur J Nucl Med; 1992; 19(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 1563443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The evolution of the system of radiological protection: outline of new ICRP recommendations]. Kawasaki H Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jun; 60(6):796-801. PubMed ID: 15220866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. ICRP comes up trumps. Webb G J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):251-2. PubMed ID: 16926467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. 125I thyroid intakes: consideration of thyroid radiation dose, and air and water concentration limits. Cranley K; Bell TK Int J Appl Radiat Isot; 1979 Mar; 30(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 447422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ICRP Publication 134: Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides: Part 2. Paquet F; Bailey MR; Leggett RW; Lipsztein J; Fell TP; Smith T; Nosske D; Eckerman KF; Berkovski V; Ansoborlo E; Giussani A; Bolch WE; Harrison JD; Ann ICRP; 2016 Dec; 45(3-4):7-349. PubMed ID: 28657340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is radiation protection for the unborn child guaranteed by radiation protection for female workers? Nosske D; Karcher K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 105(1-4):269-72. PubMed ID: 14526969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translation of dose coefficients From ICRP 53 to ICRP 80. Moussa HM; Melanson MA Health Phys; 2013 Feb; 104(2):224-6. PubMed ID: 23274826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statement and recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection from its 1980 meeting. Sowby FD Radiology; 1980 Jul; 136(1):239-41. PubMed ID: 7384511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. Ann ICRP; 1981; 6(2-3):1-124. PubMed ID: 7332161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The present ICRP protection quantities are seriously flawed. Favouring the proposition. Thomas RH; Edwards AA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 12862249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of the new nuclear decay data of ICRP publication 107 on inhalation dose coefficients for workers. Manabe K; Endo A; Eckerman KF Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 19914964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of the draft 2005 recommendations of ICRP on secondary derived regulatory values being considered by the US Department of Energy. O'Connell P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 16105895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 39th Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture: Dosimetry of Internal Emitters: Contribution of Radiation Protection Bodies and Radiological Events. Eckerman KF Health Phys; 2016 Feb; 110(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 26717179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The development of protection standards for intakes of radionuclides (1955-2005). Stather JW Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(4):383-97. PubMed ID: 15273357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overview of ICRP Committee 2: doses from radiation exposure. Harrison JD; Paquet F Ann ICRP; 2016 Jun; 45(1 Suppl):17-24. PubMed ID: 26984902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The present ICRP protection quantitites are seriously flawed. Opposing the proposition. Edwards AA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 12862250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of the weighting tissue factors in dose assessments. Bonchuk YV Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol; 2013; (18):38-49. PubMed ID: 25191709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]