These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7231004)

  • 1. [Increased objektivation in electric response audiometry (author's transl)].
    Hönerloh HJ; Kletti J
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Apr; 60(4):178-80. PubMed ID: 7231004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Brain stem evoked response audiometry via air- and bone-conducted stimulation (author's transl)].
    Hofmann G; Flach M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 May; 60(5):264-7. PubMed ID: 7231015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The effect of rarefaction and condensation tone pips on early auditory evoked potentials (EAEP) (author's transl)].
    Maurer K; Schäfer E; Leitner H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Sep; 60(9):484-7. PubMed ID: 7345316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Influence of the stimulation interval on the pattern of the evoked potential in E.R.A (author's transl)].
    Schunicht R; Esser G
    HNO; 1973 Dec; 21(12):373-6. PubMed ID: 4786011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and accuracy of electric response audiometry using the auditory steady-state response: evaluation in an empirical design.
    Kaf WA; Durrant JD; Sabo DL; Robert Boston J; Taubman LB; Kovacyk K
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):211-23. PubMed ID: 16684702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evoked response audiometry (ERA in children with cerebral palsy) (author's transl)].
    Mathis A; Graf K
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1974 Jun; 206(3):261-81. PubMed ID: 4408009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural interactions of electrically and acoustically evoked responses recorded from the inferior colliculus of guinea pigs.
    Noh H; Abbas PJ; Abbas CA; Nourski KV; Robinson BK; Jeng FC
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jun; 46(6):309-20. PubMed ID: 17530515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of temporal stimulus changes on speech-evoked potentials revealed by approximations of tone-evoked waveforms.
    Burger M; Hoppe U; Lohscheller J; Eysholdt U; Döllinger M
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19050643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials (author's transl)].
    Baschek V; Steinert W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Oct; 59(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 7453423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamics of infraslow potentials in the primary auditory cortex: component analysis and contribution of specific thalamic-cortical and non-specific brainstem-cortical influences.
    Filippov IV; Williams WC; Krebs AA; Pugachev KS
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1219():66-77. PubMed ID: 18534565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A practical application of brainstem evoked response audiometry (author's transl)].
    Janssen T
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Sep; 60(9):474-7. PubMed ID: 7345314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Influence of the pressure rise steepness of clicks to early neural responses (author's transl)].
    Stecker M
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1974 Jun; 206(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 4407916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Auditory brain stem response and middle latency response in hearing test. (I) Investigations in normal adult subjects (author's transl)].
    Hirai Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1978 May; 81(5):477-86. PubMed ID: 671146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical electric response audiometry hearing threshold estimation: accuracy, speed, and the effects of stimulus presentation features.
    Lightfoot G; Kennedy V
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):443-56. PubMed ID: 16957496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory evoked potential: clinical applications of brainstem electric response audiometry.
    Cummings RJ; Schroder TL
    J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Jan; 81(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 7351505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [An approach for proper recording of the unit discharge in auditory nerve and inferior colliculus].
    Pan T; Cao KL; Wang ZZ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Oct; 23(5):481-4. PubMed ID: 12905867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Augmentation of plasticity of the central auditory system by the basal forebrain and/or somatosensory cortex.
    Ma X; Suga N
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jan; 89(1):90-103. PubMed ID: 12522162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reply to: "M. Delaroche, R. Thiebaut, R. Dauman, Behavioural audiometry: protocols for measuring hearing thresholds in babies aged 4-18 months" [Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 68 (2004) 1233-1243].
    Killan EC; Totten CL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Sep; 69(9):1291-3; author reply 1295-7. PubMed ID: 16046002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrically evoked auditory steady-state responses in a guinea pig model: latency estimates and effects of stimulus parameters.
    Jeng FC; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ; Miller CA; Nourski KV; Robinson BK
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 18075245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.