These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7232454)

  • 21. Effects of altering motivation for food in rats trained with food reinforcement to discriminate between d-amphetamine and saline injections.
    Lotfizadeh AD; Redner R; Edwards TL; Quisenberry AJ; Baker LE; Poling A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2012 Dec; 103(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 22963928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of morphine, d-amphetamine, and pentobarbital on shock and light discrimination performance in rats.
    Grilly DM; Genovese RF; Nowak MJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 70(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 6776582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of electroconvulsive shock on the discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine and apomorphine: evidence for dopamine receptor alteration subsequent ECS.
    White DK; Barrett RJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1981; 73(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 6787638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interaction of d-amphetamine with pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide: effects on punished and unpunished behavior of pigeons.
    Barrett JE; Witkin JM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1976 Sep; 5(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 996061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of d-amphetamine on temporal and spatial discrimination in rats.
    Sanger DJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1978 Jul; 58(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 98789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of phencyclidine, d-amphetamine and pentobarbital on schedule-controlled behavior in rats.
    Segal SA; Moerschbaecher JM; Thompson DM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Nov; 15(5):807-12. PubMed ID: 7312916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies.
    Spealman RD; Katz JL; Witkin JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 702026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pentobarbital and d-amphetamine effects on concurrent performances.
    Bacotti AV
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):141-58. PubMed ID: 429957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Discrimination of the amphetamine cue. Effects of A, B and mixed type inhibitors of monoamine oxidase.
    Porsolt RD; Pawelec C; Roux S; Jalfre M
    Neuropharmacology; 1984 May; 23(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 6429563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retention of sequential drug discriminations under fixed-interval schedules for long time periods without training.
    Li M; McMillan DE
    Eur J Pharmacol; 2003 Aug; 476(1-2):79-85. PubMed ID: 12969752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intranucleus accumbens amphetamine infusions enhance responding maintained by a stimulus complex paired with oral ethanol self-administration.
    Slawecki CJ; Samson HH; Chappell A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Dec; 58(4):1065-73. PubMed ID: 9408215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conjunctive schedules of reinforcement. I. Rate-dependent effects of pentobarbital and d-amphetamine.
    Barrett JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Nov; 22(3):561-73. PubMed ID: 4436616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of phencyclidine, pentobarbital, and d-amphetamine on the acquisition and performance of conditional discriminations in monkeys.
    Moerschbaecher JM; Thompson DM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1980 Dec; 13(6):887-94. PubMed ID: 7208553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine in the rhesus monkey.
    Garza RD; Johanson CE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1983 Jul; 19(1):145-8. PubMed ID: 6622506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of amphetamine-CNS depressant combinations and of other CNS stimulants in four-choice drug discriminations.
    Li M; Wessinger WD; McMillan DE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):77-97. PubMed ID: 16156138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Drug discrimination under two concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedules.
    McMillan DE; Li M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):55-77. PubMed ID: 10966096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Drug discrimination and generalization in pigeons.
    Leberer MR; Fowler SC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1977 Nov; 7(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 594094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of training paradigm on specificity of drug mixture discriminations.
    Mariathasan EA; Stolerman IP; White JA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Oct; 64(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 10515322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Amphetamine-induced taste aversion demonstrated with operant behaviour.
    Stolerman IP; D'Mello GD
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1978 Feb; 8(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 652820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Specific antagonism of the behavioral effects of chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital in the rat.
    Schechter MD
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 1984; 8(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 6435177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.