These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7232752)
1. A sterile radiation shield for fixed imaging and C- or U-arm cinefluorographic systems. Wong M Radiology; 1981 Jun; 139(3):751-2. PubMed ID: 7232752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cinefluorographic motion picture production technics including cinefluorographic data analysis. Sloan RF; Westover JL; Brummett SW; Mansfield L Dent Radiogr Photogr; 1967; 40(2):31-2 passim. PubMed ID: 5229157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of operator radiation exposure between C-arm and O-arm fluoroscopy for orthopaedic surgery. Park MS; Lee KM; Lee B; Min E; Kim Y; Jeon S; Huh Y; Lee K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Mar; 148(4):431-8. PubMed ID: 21525041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An adjustable sterile lead apron for radiation protection during angiography. Grollman JH; Sanchez JL Radiology; 1979 Aug; 132(2):489. PubMed ID: 461815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A simple method to include the mirror image of circulation magnitudes in the cinefluorographic films]. Bühlmeyer K Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1965 Jul; 103(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 5891534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A simple technique for intra-operative radiation protection in trauma and orthopaedic procedures. Lee P; Shanbhag V; Iorwerth A Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Feb; 75(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 19358409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield. Politi L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Nocetti L; Costi T; Monopoli D; Rossi R; Sgura F; Modena MG; Sangiorgi GM Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21520391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The alminium filter for density compensation in cinefluorographic lateral craniography]. Furuya K; Oata N Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1970 Dec; 37(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 5279898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a sterile, disposable, radiation-absorbing shield reduces occupational exposure to scatter radiation during pectoral device implantation. Simons GR; Orrison WW Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 27(6 Pt 1):726-9. PubMed ID: 15189526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cinefluorographic analysis of the temporomandibular joint. McLeran JH; Montgomery JC; Hale ML J Am Dent Assoc; 1967 Dec; 75(6):1394-401. PubMed ID: 5234123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Irregular field shaping in radiation therapy-experience of the use of "Sheller Shield"]. Ishikawa D; Ugi T; Ichikawa K; Fujii M Rinsho Hoshasen; 1975 Dec; 20(13):1189-94. PubMed ID: 1240502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New shield protects oral tissues during radiation. J Am Dent Assoc; 1994 May; 125(5):508. PubMed ID: 8195491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A radiation protection device for use during percutaneous transhepatic examinations. Miotto D; Feltrin G; Calamosca M Radiology; 1984 Jun; 151(3):799. PubMed ID: 6718743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A flexible shield to protect personnel during interventional procedures. Miller DL; Vucich JJ; Cope C Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):825. PubMed ID: 4001386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. To shield or not to shield: application of bismuth breast shields. Colletti PM; Micheli OA; Lee KH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 23436837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]