These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7233205)

  • 1. Cancer institute passes first test in senate.
    Sun M
    Science; 1981 Jun; 212(4499):1122. PubMed ID: 7233205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. U.S. science policy. GOP takes Senate, budget uncertain.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5597):1313. PubMed ID: 12434024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The politics of breast cancer.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5095):616-7. PubMed ID: 8430307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The rise of the bean counters.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6871):466-7. PubMed ID: 11823822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicine and Public Affairs. Biomedical research policy--a new inquiry begins.
    Greenberg DS
    N Engl J Med; 1975 Feb; 292(9):489-90. PubMed ID: 1113838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Politics and health: recent debate in Congress questions some government grants.
    Bruckbauer S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(3):169-70. PubMed ID: 14759979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research, innovation and politics.
    Hart DM; Branscomb LM
    Nature; 2000 Oct; 407(6804):561-2. PubMed ID: 11034186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reflections on the image of otolaryngology to third-party payers and federal agencies.
    Cohn AM
    Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(2):ORL219-21. PubMed ID: 1129910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The myths of science.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1990 May; 335(8700):1267-8. PubMed ID: 1971333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. U.S. budget. Biosciences lose out to defence.
    Beardsley T; Wright K
    Nature; 1986 Feb 13-19; 319(6054):526-7. PubMed ID: 3945337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Senate bills back huge increases.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1997 Jan; 275(5300):608. PubMed ID: 9019814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NSF does well, NIH does not in Clinton's 1994 budget.
    Mervis J
    Nature; 1993 Apr; 362(6419):382-3. PubMed ID: 8464460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HEW: Finch tries to gain control over department's advisory groups.
    Science; 1969 May; 164(3881):813-4. PubMed ID: 5818731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Science and the new administration.
    Bishop JM; Kirschner M; Varmus H
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5094):444-5. PubMed ID: 8424162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SOS (again) at the Department of Energy.
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6793):219. PubMed ID: 10917491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medicine and public affairs. HEW-NIH détente, plus other matters.
    Greenberg DS
    N Engl J Med; 1974 Mar; 290(13):755-6. PubMed ID: 4813757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New hands on the purse strings.
    Booth W; Crawford M; Sun M
    Science; 1989 Jan; 243(4888):160. PubMed ID: 2643159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reagan versus the social sciences.
    Holden C
    Science; 1984 Nov; 226(4678):1052-4. PubMed ID: 6494921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Large research facilities to lose out in science spending spree?
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6793):221-2. PubMed ID: 10917492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. R&D budget takes shape in Congress, piece by piece. NIH: the view from the Senate.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5223):471. PubMed ID: 7624768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.