These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7233283)

  • 1. [Signal-noise relationship, resolution and dose requirement in the quality comparison of newer intensified films in clinical radiology].
    Knedel H; Weberling R; Hagemann G
    Rontgenpraxis; 1981; 34(4):168-75. PubMed ID: 7233283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical testing of an image memory in peroperative roentgen diagnosis].
    Ewen K
    Chirurg; 1979 Feb; 50(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 421630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editorial: Imaging in radiology.
    Br Med J; 1975 Sep; 3(5984):605-6. PubMed ID: 1164630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-dose radiography of children.
    Wesenberg RL; Blumhagen JD; Rossi RP; Hilton SV; Gilbert JM; Nedeau DJ
    Radiol Technol; 1980; 51(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 7384433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Principles of digital imaging.
    van der Stelt PF
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):237-48, v. PubMed ID: 10740766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of kilovoltage and milliamperage on focal spot size.
    Engel TL
    Radiol Technol; 1979; 50(5):559-61. PubMed ID: 493502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of relationships between physical measurements and user evaluation of image quality.
    Tapiovaara MJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):244-8. PubMed ID: 18252851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.
    Vano E; Fernandez JM; Ten JI; Gonzalez L; Guibelalde E; Prieto C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16461529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Tingberg A; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15933117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
    Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
    Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality control of equipment used in digital and interventional radiology.
    Zoetelief J; van Soldt RT; Suliman II; Jansen JT; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):277-82. PubMed ID: 16461518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality measurements in radiology.
    Tapiovaara M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):116-9. PubMed ID: 16461535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications.
    Loubele M; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; White SC; Suetens P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18583372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters.
    Rampado O; Isoardi P; Ropolo R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.