105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7237603)
1. [The non-stress test in risk pregnancy].
Zikmund J; Mĕchurová A
Cesk Gynekol; 1981 Mar; 46(2):114-5. PubMed ID: 7237603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The non-stress test. A test without stimulus for determining fetal well-being].
Vazquez Zárate VM; Villanueva Sámano LC
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1983 Aug; 51(316):213-6. PubMed ID: 6681302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies.
Cederlind CJ
J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Prognostic value of prenatal monitoring of the fetal heart rate].
Leibschang J
Probl Med Wieku Rozwoj; 1982; 11():149-68. PubMed ID: 7178078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cardiotocographic criteria for the fetus at risk].
Bruchác D
Cesk Gynekol; 1980 Jun; 45(5):354-6. PubMed ID: 7397846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Relationship between cardiotocographic monitoring ans SPl-beta-1-glycoprotein].
Catalano D; Iannotti G; Campanile M; Daniele F
Arch Ostet Ginecol; 1980; 85(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 6979994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sinusoidal patterns.
Cherny WB
Ariz Med; 1981 Feb; 38(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 7213066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Spontaneous registration of the fetal cardiac rhythm during pregnancy (non-stress test). Critical prospective use of the Krebs-Fischer score].
Gleyze P; Lhuillier D; Salvat J
Nouv Presse Med; 1980 Nov; 9(45):3461. PubMed ID: 7443508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Value of monitoring the antepartum fetal heart rate].
Lozano de la Garza JG; Martínez Lozano D; Támez González JA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1982 Dec; 50(308):329-32. PubMed ID: 6926921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of urinary estrogens, contraction stress tests and nonstress tests in the management of postterm pregnancy.
Khouzami VA; Johnson JW; Daikoku NH; Rotmensch J; Hernandez E
J Reprod Med; 1983 Mar; 28(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 6854549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of the fetal heart rate: revolution or reformism?].
Gagliardi L
Minerva Med; 1980 May; 71(19):1351-6. PubMed ID: 7383395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Antepartum fetal testing: evaluation and redefinition of criteria for clinical interpretation.
Aladjem S; Vuolo K; Pazos R; Lueck J
Semin Perinatol; 1981 Apr; 5(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 7323821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The "non-stress test" as a new examination method in prenatal diagnosis].
Bártfai G; Kovács L
Orv Hetil; 1981 Oct; 122(40):2470-2. PubMed ID: 7322547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Antepartum fetal evaluation by maternal perception of fetal movement.
Liston RM; Cohen AW; Mennuti MT; Gabbe SG
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Oct; 60(4):424-6. PubMed ID: 7121927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cardiotocographic findings during amniocentesis in monitoring high-risk pregnancies].
Paladini A; Di Lieto A; Rullo F; Catalano D
Minerva Ginecol; 1980 Oct; 32(10):881-6. PubMed ID: 7432698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L
Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The nonstress test. A preliminary report of a graded classification.
O'Leary JA; Mendenhall HW; Andrinopoulos GC
J Reprod Med; 1980 Nov; 25(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 7452634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A combined Doppler-ECG system for recording fetal systolic time intervals.
Landini L; Zacutti A; Righi E; Bernardi E
J Nucl Med Allied Sci; 1979; 23(1-2):5-14. PubMed ID: 544740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
Rayburn W; Greene J; Donaldson M
J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal movements and fetal health.
Sadovsky E
Semin Perinatol; 1981 Apr; 5(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 7034207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
