These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7237812)

  • 1. Evaluation of method-comparison data.
    Eksborg S
    Clin Chem; 1981 Jul; 27(7):1311-2. PubMed ID: 7237812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two rapid methods for determination of serum theophylline concentrations: a comparison.
    Fling JA; Widish JR; Heald JI; Olsen PE; Reid MJ; Martin ME
    Ann Allergy; 1989 Jan; 62(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 2912324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of five different plasma homocysteine assays in routine analysis.
    Bianchi V; Lanati A; Martino F; Piccinini S; Pinca A; Sida G; Demicheli M; Arfini C; Vidali M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2012 Nov; 413(21-22):1768-9. PubMed ID: 22750734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of relationships between FT4 and log TSH in Access DXI 800 Unicel, Modular E170 and ADVIA Centaur XP Analyzer.
    Serdar MA; Ozgurtas T; Ispir E; Kenar L; Senes M; Yücel D; Bilgi C; Kurt I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Oct; 50(10):1849-52. PubMed ID: 23089718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of theophylline concentrations by AccuLevel.
    Nguyen QC; Sly RM; Boeckx RL; Shier JM
    Ann Allergy; 1988 Jun; 60(6):521-2. PubMed ID: 3289419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytical evaluation of the new Abbott Architect 25-OH vitamin D assay.
    Cavalier E; Carlisi A; Bekaert AC; Rousselle O; Chapelle JP; Souberbielle JC
    Clin Biochem; 2012 Apr; 45(6):505-8. PubMed ID: 22321565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis.
    Cornbleet PJ; Gochman N
    Clin Chem; 1979 Mar; 25(3):432-8. PubMed ID: 262186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the best formula for predicting osmolar gap?
    Osypiw JC; Watson ID; Gill G
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1997 Sep; 34 ( Pt 5)():551-2. PubMed ID: 9293312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reference values: Bhattacharya or the method proposed by the IFCC?
    Oosterhuis WP; Modderman TA; Pronk C
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1990 Jul; 27 ( Pt 4)():359-65. PubMed ID: 2403235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Use of formulas for calculating serum osmolality].
    Forzy G; Quelquejay J; Dhondt JL
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2003; 61(1):103-5. PubMed ID: 12604395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is the best formula for predicting osmolar gap?
    Osypiw JC; Watson ID; Gill G
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1997 Nov; 34 ( Pt 6)():692-3. PubMed ID: 9367011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of naproxen using DBS: evaluation & pharmacokinetic comparison of human plasma versus human blood DBS.
    Youhnovski N; Michon J; Latour S; Mess JN; Bergeron A; Furtado M; Rufiange M; Guibord P; Lefebvre M; Macarthur RB; Garofolo F
    Bioanalysis; 2010 Aug; 2(8):1501-13. PubMed ID: 21083350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the ratio HDL-cholesterol/total cholesterol on the Reflotron vs. conventional wet chemistry methods.
    Herruer MH; Kluitenberg WE; Zuijderhoudt FM
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1992 Mar; 30(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 1599979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The "index of fiduciality" proposed for use in evaluation and comparison of methods.
    Fraser CG; Browning MC
    Clin Chem; 1988 Jun; 34(6):1356-7. PubMed ID: 3378336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Drift correction--a comparative evaluation of some alternatives.
    McLelland AS; Fleck A
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1978 Sep; 15(5):281-90. PubMed ID: 718112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Addendum to a paper on method-comparison analysis.
    Naus IA
    Clin Chem; 1983 Sep; 29(9):1697-8. PubMed ID: 6883695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multicentre evaluation of the Boehringer Mannheim/Hitachi 717 analysis system.
    Baadenhuijsen H; Bayer PM; Keller H; Knedel M; Montalbetti N; Brenna S; Prencipe L; Vassault A; Bailly M; Phung HT
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1990 Apr; 28(4):261-9. PubMed ID: 2193104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A new comparison method of HDL-cholesterol measurement for evaluation of routine methods].
    Sakurabayashi I
    Rinsho Byori; 2002 Mar; 50(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 11985049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of gas chromatography with headspace injectors, the Aull-McCord chemical method and the Alcotest ethylometer in the determination of blood alcohol].
    Glisović L; Vranesević G
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 1993; 50(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 8212654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a Coulter Chemistry Unit.
    Haven M; Haven G; Fellows P; Hicks R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1976 Jul; 66(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 937257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.