These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. FL: does peer review apply to nurses notes?: defendant dr. attempts to invoke peer privilege. Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1999 Feb; 39(9):3. PubMed ID: 10223027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The embryonic self-evaluative privilege: a primer for health care lawyers. O'Neill TF; Charnes AH Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):33-44. PubMed ID: 10164520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical review committee resisted subpoenas for records. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1979 Nov; 60(11):78. PubMed ID: 488990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal review: a case study from California--the sharing of peer review information between hospitals and nonhospital providers. Brown LC Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 May; 14(4):68-73. PubMed ID: 10134763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Medical confidentiality towards health insurance, employment, state offices and health insurance companies--legal guidelines]. Schreiber HL Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1999 Dec; 93(10):762-6;discussion 773-4. PubMed ID: 10683894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. HIPAA. Courts protect sensitive medical records from DOJ. AIDS Policy Law; 2004 Apr; 19(8):8. PubMed ID: 15146836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records. Peterson RN Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Privacy Act update: some evaluations after 18 months. Moss D Med Rec News; 1977 Feb; 48(1):66, 68-9. PubMed ID: 10305606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical society head battles state over Medicaid records. Am Med News; 1979 Jan; 22(1):3. PubMed ID: 10324749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. DC Circuit rules PSROs not government agencies under Freedom of Information Act. Askwith JA; Kemezys KP Health Law Vigil; 1981 Oct; 4(22):2-4. PubMed ID: 10273280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A tribunal's perspective on Ontario's proposed health information law. Bay M Health Law Can; 1998 May; 18(4):131-3. PubMed ID: 10181442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Proctoring can be a legal quagmire. Chenen AR Mod Healthc; 1984 May; 14(7):190-3. PubMed ID: 10266697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Facing the limits on uses of medical and peer review information: are high technology and confidentiality on a collision course? Brown LC; Stanton WC; Paye W Whittier Law Rev; 1997; 19(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 12071205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Resolving privacy, access, and other problems in the audit and reanalysis of social research for policy. Baratz SS; Marvin KE Evaluation; 1978; ():31-5. PubMed ID: 10238441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]