193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7239828)
1. Patients' rights raises questions for psychology, psychiatry and law.
Ziegenfuss JT
Int J Soc Psychiatry; 1981; 27(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 7239828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The myth of advocacy.
Stone AA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Dec; 30(12):819-22. PubMed ID: 500019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The crisis in psychiatry and the protection of the civil rights of mentally ill patients].
Rutkowski R; Gordon T
Psychiatr Pol; 1994; 28(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 8078961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mental health law: civil liberties and the principle of reciprocity.
Eastman N
BMJ; 1994 Jan; 308(6920):43-5. PubMed ID: 8179659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal issues in the assessment and treatment of individuals with dual diagnoses.
Bersoff DN; Glass DJ; Blain N
J Consult Clin Psychol; 1994 Feb; 62(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 8034829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patients' rights and the psychiatrist's dilemma.
Kopolow LE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1976; 4(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 1027500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Law, psychiatry and rights.
Miller RD
Med Law; 1991; 10(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 1775004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meeting the patients' rights challenge through mental health advocacy.
Kopolow LE
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1977 May; 28(5):383-4. PubMed ID: 858603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Who is to protect the rights of hospitalized mental patients?
Ginath Y
Med Law; 1993; 12(3-5):287-90. PubMed ID: 8231696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
Appelbaum PS
Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extremely unbalanced: interest divergence and power disparities between clients and psychiatry.
McCubbin M; Cohen D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1996; 19(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 8929656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Civil rights of psychiatric patients in the United States. Minimal medical and constitutional standards for adequate treatment].
Kunze H
Psychiatr Prax; 1976 May; 3(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 1027015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical authority and the culture of rights.
Halpern SA
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2004; 29(4-5):835-52; discussion 1005-19. PubMed ID: 15602848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The mental patients' rights movement and mental health institutional change.
Brown P
Int J Health Serv; 1981; 11(4):523-40. PubMed ID: 7333723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Davis v. Watkins on Ohio forensic hospital practice.
Heller A
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(1):39-62. PubMed ID: 508964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The legal restraints on psychiatric care.
Feldman WS
Leg Med; 1980; ():221-7. PubMed ID: 7421390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient access to medical records--from issue to law. Part I: An historical perspective.
Morgan C
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 May; 55(5):30-3. PubMed ID: 10310606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The rights of citizens while being delivered psychiatric care].
Trushchelëv SA
Voen Med Zh; 2000 Feb; 321(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 10870454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient privacy: a consumer protection approach.
Brannigan VM
J Med Syst; 1984 Dec; 8(6):501-5. PubMed ID: 6527078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The application of the patients' rights law in psychiatry].
Finzi R; Tyano S
Harefuah; 2002 Jan; 141(1):100-2, 123. PubMed ID: 11851093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
