206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7240017)
1. Comparison of sperm-rich fractions of boar semen collected by electroejaculation and the gloved-hand technique.
Basurto-Kuba VM; Evans LE
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1981 May; 178(9):985-6. PubMed ID: 7240017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of electroejaculation and transrectal massage for semen collection in range and yearling feedlot beef bulls.
Palmer CW; Brito LF; Arteaga AA; Söderquist L; Persson Y; Barth AD
Anim Reprod Sci; 2005 Jun; 87(1-2):25-31. PubMed ID: 15885438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Description of semen characteristics from six-banded armadillos (Euphractus sexcinctus) collected by electroejaculation.
Serafim MK; Lira RA; Costa LL; Gadelha IC; Freitas CI; Silva AR
Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 Apr; 118(2-4):362-5. PubMed ID: 19748749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effects of autologous and homologous seminal plasma on the viability of largely extended boar spermatozoa.
Caballero I; Vazquez JM; Centurión F; Rodríguez-Martinez H; Parrilla I; Roca J; Cuello C; Martinez EA
Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Oct; 39(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 15367272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of semen collection method on sperm motility of gray wolves (Canis lupus) and domestic dogs (C. l. familiaris).
Christensen BW; Asa CS; Wang C; Vansandt L; Bauman K; Callahan M; Jens JK; Ellinwood NM
Theriogenology; 2011 Sep; 76(5):975-80. PubMed ID: 21752444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors influencing boar sperm cryosurvival.
Roca J; Hernández M; Carvajal G; Vázquez JM; Martínez EA
J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2692-9. PubMed ID: 16971570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collection and quality of rhesus monkey semen.
Lanzendorf SE; Gliessman PM; Archibong AE; Alexander M; Wolf DP
Mol Reprod Dev; 1990 Jan; 25(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 2393585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of different procedures of ejaculate collection, extenders and packages on DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa following freezing-thawing.
Fraser L; Strzezek J
Anim Reprod Sci; 2007 Jun; 99(3-4):317-29. PubMed ID: 16889911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of semen collection method on ejaculate characteristics in the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus.
Morrell JM; Küderling I; Hodges JK
J Androl; 1996; 17(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 8723441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semen collection by electroejaculation in the domestic cat.
Platz CC; Seager SW
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1978 Nov; 173(10):1353-5. PubMed ID: 730615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semen collection in rhinoceroses (Rhinoceros unicornis, Diceros bicornis, Ceratotherium simum) by electroejaculation with a uniquely designed probe.
Roth TL; Stoops MA; Atkinson MW; Blumer ES; Campbell MK; Cameron KN; Citino SB; Maas AK
J Zoo Wildl Med; 2005 Dec; 36(4):617-27. PubMed ID: 17312718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do different portions of the boar ejaculate vary in their ability to sustain cryopreservation?
Peña FJ; Saravia F; Núñez-Martínez I; Johannisson A; Wallgren M; Rodriguez Martinez H
Anim Reprod Sci; 2006 Jun; 93(1-2):101-13. PubMed ID: 16084673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semen collection in cats: techniques and analysis.
Zambelli D; Cunto M
Theriogenology; 2006 Jul; 66(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 16527340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of a high semen-collection frequency on the quality of sperm from ejaculates and from six epididymal regions in boars.
Pruneda A; Pinart E; Dolors Briz M; Sancho S; Garcia-Gil N; Badia E; Kádár E; Bassols J; Bussalleu E; Yeste M; Bonet S
Theriogenology; 2005 May; 63(8):2219-32. PubMed ID: 15826685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality and freezing qualities of first and second ejaculates collected from endangered Gulf Coast Native rams.
Nel-Themaat L; Harding GD; Chandler JE; Chenevert JF; Damiani P; Fernandez JM; Humes PE; Pope CE; Godke RA
Anim Reprod Sci; 2006 Oct; 95(3-4):251-61. PubMed ID: 16289553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of factors affecting semen traits in artificial insemination boars from animal model analyses.
Wolf J; Smital J
J Anim Sci; 2009 May; 87(5):1620-7. PubMed ID: 19181771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of semen characteristics and sperm cell ultrastructure of captive coatis (Nasua nasua) collected by electroejaculation.
Lima GL; Barros FF; Costa LL; Castelo TS; Fontenele-Neto JD; Silva AR
Anim Reprod Sci; 2009 Oct; 115(1-4):225-30. PubMed ID: 19097713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dialysis of boar semen prior to freezing-thawing: its effects on post-thaw sperm characteristics.
Fraser L; Dziekońska A; Strzezek R; Strzezek J
Theriogenology; 2007 Mar; 67(5):994-1003. PubMed ID: 17218000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic parameters for semen traits in AI boars estimated from data on individual ejaculates.
Wolf J
Reprod Domest Anim; 2009 Apr; 44(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 19323799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Kinematic changes during the cryopreservation of boar spermatozoa.
Cremades T; Roca J; Rodriguez-Martinez H; Abaigar T; Vazquez JM; Martinez EA
J Androl; 2005; 26(5):610-8. PubMed ID: 16088038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
