160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7240036)
1. Comparison of three-breed and backcross swine for litter productivity and postweaning performance.
Wilson ER; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 1981 Jan; 52(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 7240036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sow productivity comparisons for four breeds of swine: purebred and crossbred litters.
Gaugler HR; Buchanan DS; Hintz RL; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 1984 Oct; 59(4):941-7. PubMed ID: 6542563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons of specific crosses from Duroc, Hampshire and Spot backcross sows.
Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
J Anim Sci; 1985 Mar; 60(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 4039311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal performance of Duroc, Hampshire and Landrace backcross gilts fed normal and high fiber diets during postweaning growth.
Stewart TS; Drewry KJ
J Anim Sci; 1983 Sep; 57(3):565-76. PubMed ID: 6313586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breed prenatal, breed postnatal and heterosis effects for postweaning traits in swine.
Toelle VD; Robison OW
J Anim Sci; 1983 Aug; 57(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 6619010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparisons of specific crosses from Duroc-Landrace, Yorkshire-Landrace and Hampshire-Landrace sows managed in two types of gestation systems: pig performance.
Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
J Anim Sci; 1989 Oct; 67(10):2595-602. PubMed ID: 2808165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproduction of 3/4 White Composite and 1/4 Duroc, 1/4 Meishan, 1/4 Fengjing, or 1/4 Minzhu gilts and sows.
Young LD
J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1559-67. PubMed ID: 9655575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons of specific crosses from Yorkshire-Landrace, Chester White-Landrace and Chester White-Yorkshire sows.
Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Moore RA
J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1132-8. PubMed ID: 3397340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of Duroc, Meishan, Fengjing, and Minzhu boars on productivity of mates and growth of first-cross progeny.
Young LD
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2020-9. PubMed ID: 1644674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Growth performance for four breeds of swine: crossbred females and purebred and crossbred boars.
McLaren DG; Buchanan DS; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 1987 Jan; 64(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 3818493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of selected and control lines of Duroc and Yorkshire pigs and their reciprocal crossbred progeny.
Bereskin B
J Anim Sci; 1983 Oct; 57(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 6643303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maternal effects on traits measured during postweaning performance test of swine from four breeds.
Johnson ZB; Chewning JJ; Nugent RA
J Anim Sci; 2002 Jun; 80(6):1470-7. PubMed ID: 12078726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reciprocal recurrent selection for 21-day litter weight of crossbred gilts. II. Reproductive performance of purebred females producing purebred and two-way cross litters and performance of purebred and crossbred pigs.
Young LD; Omtvedt IT; Whatley JA; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 1983 Dec; 57(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 6674283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breed and heterotic effects on postweaning traits in Altex and New Zealand White straightbred and crossbred rabbits.
Medellin MF; Lukefahr SD
J Anim Sci; 2001 May; 79(5):1173-8. PubMed ID: 11374536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An experimental comparison of equivalent terminal and rotational crossbreeding systems in swine: sow and litter performance.
Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
J Anim Sci; 1994 Mar; 72(3):584-90. PubMed ID: 8181973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of six maternal genetic lines for female productivity measures over four parities.
Moeller SJ; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Mabry JW; Baas TJ; Robison OW
J Anim Sci; 2004 Jan; 82(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 14753347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproductive performance for four breeds of swine: crossbred females and purebred and crossbred boars.
Buchanan DS; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 1984 Oct; 59(4):948-56. PubMed ID: 6511683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
Petry DB; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of progeny sired by high and low indexing Hampshire and Duroc central test station boars: progeny performance.
Bates RO; Buchanan DS
J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1089-99. PubMed ID: 3397335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the NE Index line. II. Growth and carcass responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
Petry DB; Holl JW; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):1895-902. PubMed ID: 15309934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
