These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7240559)

  • 1. Identification and discrimination of a synthesized voicing contrast by normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired children.
    Parady S; Dorman MF; Whaley P; Raphael LJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 69(3):783-90. PubMed ID: 7240559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
    Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing of cues for stop consonant voicing by young hearing-impaired listeners.
    Johnson D; Whaley P; Dorman MF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 6716995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency discrimination ability and stop-consonant identification in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Ochs MT; Humes LE; Ohde RN; Grantham DW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 2704188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal and spectral cue use for initial plosive voicing perception by hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing children and adults.
    Holden-Pitt LD; Hazan V; Revoile SG; Edward DM; Droge J
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1995; 30(4):417-34. PubMed ID: 8634497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of synthetic /bdg/ by hearing-impaired listeners under monotic and dichotic formant presentation.
    Van de Grift Turek S; Dorman MF; Franks JR; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Mar; 67(3):1031-40. PubMed ID: 7358910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic-phonetic context considerations for speech recognition testing of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Revoile S; Kozma-Spytek L; Holden-Pitt L; Pickett J; Droge J
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 7672474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consonant similarity judgments by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Walden BE; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Schwartz DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Mar; 23(1):162-84. PubMed ID: 7442174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech competition effects on synthetic stop-vowel perception by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gordon-Salant SM; Wightman FL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 May; 73(5):1756-65. PubMed ID: 6223058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of rapid spectral change in speech by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Godfrey JJ; Millay K
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 659292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An acoustic and perceptual study of initial stops produced by profoundly hearing impaired adolescents.
    Khouw E; Ciocca V
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Jan; 21(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 17364614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Krishnan LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1228-46. PubMed ID: 1401512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fusion of dichotic consonants in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listenersa).
    Sathe NC; Kain A; Reiss LAJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jan; 155(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 38174963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cue-weighting in the perception of intervocalic stop voicing in European Portuguese.
    Pape D; Jesus LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1334. PubMed ID: 25190406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of recovered envelope cues in the identification of temporal-fine-structure speech for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Léger AC; Desloge JG; Braida LD; Swaminathan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):505-8. PubMed ID: 25618081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech-cue enhancement for the hearing impaired: amplification of burst/murmur cues for improved perception of final stop voicing.
    Revoile SG; Holden-Pitt L; Edward D; Pickett JM; Brandt F
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 3430378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.