These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7240589)

  • 1. Hybrid adaptive procedure for estimation of psychometric functions.
    Hall JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jun; 69(6):1763-9. PubMed ID: 7240589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of psychometric functions from adaptive tracking procedures.
    Leek MR; Hanna TE; Marshall L
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Mar; 51(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 1561050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Algorithm for improving psychophysical threshold estimates by detecting sustained inattention in experiments using PEST.
    Rinderknecht MD; Ranzani R; Popp WL; Lambercy O; Gassert R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1629-1645. PubMed ID: 29748784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive psychophysical procedures and imbalance in the psychometric function.
    Saberi K; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):528-36. PubMed ID: 8675846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A procedure for detecting variability of psychophysical thresholds.
    Hall JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):663-7. PubMed ID: 6841806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An interleaved tracking procedure to monitor unstable psychometric functions.
    Leek MR; Hanna TE; Marshall L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1385-97. PubMed ID: 1939903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian active probabilistic classification for psychometric field estimation.
    Song XD; Sukesan KA; Barbour DL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):798-812. PubMed ID: 29256098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.
    Kontsevich LL; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 1999 Aug; 39(16):2729-37. PubMed ID: 10492833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum-likelihood procedures and the inattentive observer.
    Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3749-60. PubMed ID: 7790653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating parameters for psychometric functions using the four-point sampling method.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; He NJ; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3697-703. PubMed ID: 9407661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive staircase techniques in psychoacoustics: a comparison of human data and a mathematical model.
    Kollmeier B; Gilkey RH; Sieben UK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 May; 83(5):1852-62. PubMed ID: 3403801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data.
    Kaernbach C
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11800464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experience with a yes-no single-interval maximum-likelihood procedure.
    Leek MR; Dubno JR; He N; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2674-84. PubMed ID: 10830389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments.
    Karmali F; Chaudhuri SE; Yi Y; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):773-89. PubMed ID: 26645306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Placement of observations for the efficient estimation of a psychometric function.
    Lam CF; Mills JH; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3689-93. PubMed ID: 8655800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast adaptive estimation of multidimensional psychometric functions.
    DiMattina C
    J Vis; 2015; 15(9):5. PubMed ID: 26200886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric functions for frequency discrimination from listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Nelson DA; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):799-805. PubMed ID: 3958322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function?
    Serrano-Pedraza I; Vancleef K; Herbert W; Goodship N; Woodhouse M; Read JCA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226822. PubMed ID: 31895925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric functions for hybrid difference discrimination/increment detection tasks.
    Shepherd D; Hautus MJ; Hutchinson H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):EL302-7. PubMed ID: 19045682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures motivated by the theory of optimal experiments: simulated and experimental results.
    Remus JJ; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):315-26. PubMed ID: 18177161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.