BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7241060)

  • 1. Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces.
    Winograd E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1981 May; 7(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 7241060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory.
    Kellogg RT; Cocklin T; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 7137417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Likability of targets and distractors in facial recognition.
    Mueller JH; Heesacker M; Ross MJ
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(2):235-47. PubMed ID: 6731653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation of a visual imagery mnemonic device for acquiring face--name associations.
    McCarty DL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Mar; 6(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 7373246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image detail and recall: evidence for within-item elaboration.
    Ritchey GH; Beal CR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Jan; 6(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 7373244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM.
    Eich JM
    Psychol Rev; 1985 Jan; 92(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 3983302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory for faces: testing method, encoding strategy, and confidence.
    Deffenbacher KA; Leu JR; Brown EL
    Am J Psychol; 1981 Mar; 94(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 7235079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Within-race and between-race recognition of transformed and untransformed faces.
    Ellis HD; Deregowski JB
    Am J Psychol; 1981 Mar; 94(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 7235082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is face distinctiveness gender based?
    Baudouin JY; Gallay M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):789-98. PubMed ID: 16846279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized.
    Wickham LH; Morris PE
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(3):455-68. PubMed ID: 14503395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthographic distinctiveness and semantic elaboration provide separate contributions to memory.
    Kirchhoff BA; Schapiro ML; Buckner RL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1841-54. PubMed ID: 16356323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distributed self in episodic memory: neural correlates of successful retrieval of self-encoded positive and negative personality traits.
    Fossati P; Hevenor SJ; Lepage M; Graham SJ; Grady C; Keightley ML; Craik F; Mayberg H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Aug; 22(4):1596-604. PubMed ID: 15275916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Voice recognition: effects of orienting task, and a test of blind versus sighted listeners.
    Winograd E; Kerr NH; Spence MJ
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 6721008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orienting strategies at study and test in facial recognition.
    Mueller JH; Wherry KL
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Mar; 93(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 7396045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of human chimeric faces by chimpanzees: evidence for a right hemisphere advantage.
    Morris RD; Hopkins WD
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Jan; 21(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 8424859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of experimental design on memory for typical and distinctive faces.
    Hosie JA; Milne AB
    Memory; 1996 Mar; 4(2):175-97. PubMed ID: 8697036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The picture superiority effect: support for the distinctiveness model.
    Mintzer MZ; Snodgrass JG
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(1):113-46. PubMed ID: 10696280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Task related information processing and generation effects in picture materials].
    Wippich W
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1985; 32(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 3993110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Encoding and use of detail information in picture recognition.
    Loftus GR; Kallman HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1979 May; 5(3):197-211. PubMed ID: 528912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The feature-positive effect in adult humans: within-group design.
    Richardson WK; Massel HK
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 7125014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.