These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7241812)

  • 1. [Reduction in cecal size and E. coli and enterococcal populations of gnotobiotic mice by chloroform-resistant bacteria from the cecum of conventional mice].
    Morishita Y; Ozaki A; Yamamoto T; Mitsu-Oka T
    Nihon Saikingaku Zasshi; 1980 Mar; 35(2):431-2. PubMed ID: 7241812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eimeria tenella in gnotobiotic chickens: hematocrit, weight change, cecal pathology, and mortality.
    Visco RJ
    J Parasitol; 1975 Apr; 61(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 805225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of bacterial flora on cecal size and transit rate of intestinal contents in mice.
    Iwai H; Ishihara Y; Yamanaka J; Ito T
    Jpn J Exp Med; 1973 Aug; 43(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 4580917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microorganisms responsible for controlling the populations of Escherichia coli and enterococcus and the consistency of cecal contents in the chicken.
    Morishita Y; Mitsuoka T
    Jpn J Microbiol; 1976 Jun; 20(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 823354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Isolation of the cecal microflora of mice and comparison between the gastro-intestinal and the fecal microfloras.
    Koopman JP; Janssen FG; van Druten JA
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1977; 19(1-2):62-70. PubMed ID: 860613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of anaerobic cecal bacteria of mice.
    Koopman JP; Kennis HM
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1979; 21(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 390923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of erythromycin on microbial antagonisms: a study in gnotobiotic mice associated with a human fecal flora.
    Andremont A; Raibaud P; Tancrède C
    J Infect Dis; 1983 Sep; 148(3):579-87. PubMed ID: 6413596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of two media for culturing the anaerobic cecal microflora of mice.
    Koopman JP; Kennis HM; Lankhorst A; Welling GW; Hectors MP; Nagengast FM; van Druten JA
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1987; 29(3-4):165-70. PubMed ID: 3617969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of gnotobiotic mice with various organisms isolated from conventional mice.
    Maejima K; Tajima Y
    Jpn J Exp Med; 1973 Aug; 43(4):289-96. PubMed ID: 4580916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The size pH, and redox potential of the cecum in mice associated with various microbial floras.
    Celesk RA; Asano T; Wagner M
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 1976 Feb; 151(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 2933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of the ingestion of varied amounts of antibiotics on the microflora of gnotoxenic mice].
    Ducluzeau R; Bellier M; Raibaud P
    Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris); 1971 Aug; 121(2):161-79. PubMed ID: 4939721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The 'normalization' of germ-free rabbits with host-specific caecal microflora.
    Boot R; Koopman JP; Kruijt BC; Lammers RM; Kennis HM; Lankhorst A; Mullink JW; Stadhouders AM; De Boer H; Welling GW
    Lab Anim; 1985 Oct; 19(4):344-52. PubMed ID: 4068663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate postnatal inoculation of a microbial barrier to prevent neonatal diarrhea induced by Clostridium difficile in young conventional and gnotobiotic hares.
    Dubos F; Martinet L; Dabard J; Ducluzeau R
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Jun; 45(6):1242-4. PubMed ID: 6742589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental intestinal microflora in mice with a changeable population size of E. coli.
    Gosse C; Faure E; Ardouin P; Andremont A; Tancrède C
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1985; 181():175-7. PubMed ID: 3161084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of normal mouse intestinal bacteria on caecal weight in mice.
    Koopman JP; Kennis HM
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1980; 22(4):224-9. PubMed ID: 7467893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of fecal microorganisms and their chloroform-resistant variants derived from mice, rats, and humans on immunological and physiological characteristics of the intestines of ex-germfree mice.
    Okada Y; Setoyama H; Matsumoto S; Imaoka A; Nanno M; Kawaguchi M; Umesaki Y
    Infect Immun; 1994 Dec; 62(12):5442-6. PubMed ID: 7960124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antagonism and adhesion among isogenic strains of Lactobacillus reuteri in the caecum of gnotobiotic mice.
    Sarra PG; Vescovo M; Bottazzi V
    Microbiologica; 1989 Jan; 12(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 2716537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevention of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in gnotobiotic mice associated with Bifidobacterium strains.
    Yoshimura K; Matsui T; Itoh K
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2010 Feb; 97(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 19911297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of bacterial contamination on cecal size and cecal contents of gnotobiotic rodents.
    Loesche WJ
    J Bacteriol; 1969 Aug; 99(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 5808078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adhesion of bacteria to the cecal mucosal surface of conventional and germ-free chickens infected with Eimeria tenella.
    Baba E; Wakeshima H; Fukui K; Fukata T; Arakawa A
    Am J Vet Res; 1992 Feb; 53(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 1575383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.