These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7242335)
1. Case specificity of the stimulus probability effect. Miller J; Hardzinski M Mem Cognit; 1981 Mar; 9(2):205-16. PubMed ID: 7242335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response-time evidence for mixed memory states in a sequential-presentation change-detection task. Nosofsky RM; Donkin C Cogn Psychol; 2016 Feb; 84():31-62. PubMed ID: 26706291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of stimulus similarity on perceptual and conceptual comparisons. Robbins DW; Bourne LE Percept Psychophys; 1983 May; 33(5):479-86. PubMed ID: 6877995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling the redundant signals effect by specifying the hazard function. Colonius H Percept Psychophys; 1988 Jun; 43(6):604-6. PubMed ID: 3399360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic and visual coding in primary and secondary memory. Laughery KR; Welte JW; Spector A J Exp Psychol; 1973 Aug; 99(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 4742546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of stimulus probability and visual similarity on stimulus encoding. Irwin DE; Pachella RG Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 4003618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceptual representation systems and implicit memory. Toward a resolution of the multiple memory systems debate. Schacter DL Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1990; 608():543-67; discussion 567-71. PubMed ID: 2075961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The psychological refractory period and the effect of stimulus discriminability. Tolkmitt FJ; Lunn SE Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 4742381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Encoding and retrieval in visual memory tasks. Frost N J Exp Psychol; 1972 Oct; 95(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 5071913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Attention switching between perception and memory. Weber RJ; Burt DB; Noll NC Mem Cognit; 1986 May; 14(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 3736397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Familiarity effects in visual information processing. Krueger LE Psychol Bull; 1975 Nov; 82(6):949-74. PubMed ID: 1103203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions. Smith EE Psychol Bull; 1968 Feb; 69(2):77-110. PubMed ID: 4867597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Implicit short-term memory and event frequency effects in visual search. Maljkovic V; Martini P Vision Res; 2005 Oct; 45(21):2831-46. PubMed ID: 16023172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual perception of musical notation: registering pitch symbols in memory. Sloboda JA Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 Feb; 28(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 1273247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Categorization response time with multidimensional stimuli. Ashby FG; Boynton G; Lee WW Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jan; 55(1):11-27. PubMed ID: 8036090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The separation of bias and sensitivity in multiple-choice tasks. Ingleby JD Perception; 1973; 2(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 4794125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual deficit due to division of attention between memory and perception. Shulman HG; Greenberg SN J Exp Psychol; 1971 May; 88(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 5577172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The effects of memory set size on encoding stage in memory scanning tasks]. Makino Y Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1984 Apr; 55(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 6471624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]