174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7243111)
1. NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth. The Cesarean Birth Task Force.
Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Apr; 57(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 7243111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Epidemiologic evaluation of large-scale perinatal programs.
Shapiro S
Mead Johnson Symp Perinat Dev Med; 1982; (20):13-21. PubMed ID: 6927514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The rising cesarean section rate: can it safely be reversed?
Minkoff HL; Schwarz RH
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 7393501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A discussion of medical malpractice and cesarean section.
Berkman H
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1993 Apr; (170):9-30. PubMed ID: 10125422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cesarean childbirth: an NIH consensus development conference.
Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1981 Sep; 20(9):555-60. PubMed ID: 7261531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development statement on cesarean childbirth. A summary.
J Reprod Med; 1981 Mar; 26(3):103-12. PubMed ID: 7230144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth.
Md State Med J; 1982 Feb; 31(2):46-54. PubMed ID: 7070126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Meeting maternal request for caesarean section - paving the road to hell?
McCandlish R
Midwifery; 2006 Sep; 22(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 16920508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Less medicalization of obstetrics in West Friesian islands than on the mainland].
Kanhai HH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Feb; 144(9):451-2. PubMed ID: 10719557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In reply. A critique of The Lancet breech article.
Osbourne A
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2001; (59):58-9. PubMed ID: 12152560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety.
Clark SL; Belfort MA; Byrum SL; Meyers JA; Perlin JB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 199(2):105.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18468573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of cesarean section on intermediate and late preterm births: United States, 2000-2003.
Malloy MH
Birth; 2009 Mar; 36(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19278380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogate markers of healthcare standards.
Murphy JF
Ir Med J; 2007 Jan; 100(1):324. PubMed ID: 17380918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Electronic fetal monitoring.
Hurst M; Summey PS
Health PAC Bull; 1979; (83-85):20-3. PubMed ID: 10242161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.
Bujold E; Gauthier RJ; Hamilton E
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2005; 50(5):363-4. PubMed ID: 16154061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Summary of consensus development conference--childbirth by cesarean delivery.
Rosen MG
J La State Med Soc; 1982; 134(3):94, 98. PubMed ID: 7119547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival advantage associated with cesarean delivery in very low birth weight vertex neonates.
Lee HC; Gould JB
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16394046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First nationwide multi-PSRO MCE unveiled: C-sections topic of study.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1979 Apr; 4(4):47-8. PubMed ID: 10273151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Position statement of the College of Obstetrics and Gynecology regarding home childbirth, January 18, 2002].
Papp Z;
Orv Hetil; 2002 Apr; 143(16):839-41. PubMed ID: 12053885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study.
Tang CH; Wang HI; Hsu CS; Su HW; Chen MJ; Lin HC
BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct; 6():246. PubMed ID: 17029640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
