These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7244229)

  • 1. Focal-spot separation in stereoscopic magnification radiography.
    Takahashi M; Ozawa Y; Takemoto H
    Radiology; 1981 Jul; 140(1):227-9. PubMed ID: 7244229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of longitudinal magnification effect to magnification stereoscopic angiography: a new method of cerebral angiography.
    Doi K; Rossmann K; Duda EE
    Radiology; 1977 Aug; 124(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 877279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The relationship between focal spot separation and the viewing distance in digital high-magnification stereoscopic radiography].
    Ikeda M; Sakuma S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Feb; 46(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 3725570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abdominal angiography with stereoscopic magnification.
    Takahashi M; Ozawa Y
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1981; 4(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 7249024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Focal spot size and scatter suppression in magnification mammography.
    Muntz EP; Logan WW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1979 Sep; 133(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 111504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of focal spot distribution on blood vessel imaging in magnification radiography.
    Doi K; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1975 Feb; 114(2):435-41. PubMed ID: 1111012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Optimal distances for direct radiographic magnification].
    Stargardt A; Angerstein W
    Rofo; 1975 Jul; 123(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 130304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of focal spot size on image resolution and test phantom scores in mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1993 May; 66(785):441-6. PubMed ID: 8319066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image magnification in digital fluoroscopy.
    Rosenstein DS
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1998; 39(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 9710131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stereoscopic magnification angiography using a twin focal-spot x-ray tube.
    Takahashi M; Ozawa Y
    Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):791-2. PubMed ID: 7063707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of image quality obtained with optical and radiographic magnification techniques in fine-detail skeletal radiography: effect of object thickness.
    Doi K; Genant HK; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 1244657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnification factor, position, and true size of an object in stereoscopic magnification radiography.
    Takahashi M
    Radiology; 1982 Jan; 142(1):215-7. PubMed ID: 7053534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mathematical approach to horizontal and vertical magnification factors in rotational panoramic radiography--with attention to redundant shadows.
    Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1991 Aug; 32(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 1819448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neonatal magnification radiography using standard-focus x-ray tubes.
    Nikesch W; Kuntzler CM; Cushing FR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Oct; 141(4):665-9. PubMed ID: 6604414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stereoscopic magnification in spinal angiography.
    Vogelsang H; Dietz K
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):588-9. PubMed ID: 6410803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic imaging using an effective rotationally symmetrical focal spot.
    Goodenough DJ; Weaver KE
    Radiology; 1976 May; 119(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 1265275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo studies on the influence of focal spot size and intensity distribution on spatial resolution in magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1369-84. PubMed ID: 18296767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serial cerebral angiography in stereoscopic magnification.
    Takahashi M; Tamakawa Y; Goto K; Kosaka M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Jun; 126(6):1211-8. PubMed ID: 179383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Focal-spot measurement: comparison of slit, pinhole, and star resolution pattern techniques.
    Everson JD; Gray JE
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):261-4. PubMed ID: 3628780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical versus radiographic magnification for fine-detail skeletal radiography.
    Genant HK; Doi K; Mall JC
    Invest Radiol; 1975; 10(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 46857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.