These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7245086)

  • 1. Use of the last menstrual period (LMP) in timing human pregnancies.
    Barr M
    Teratology; 1981 Feb; 23(1):134. PubMed ID: 7245086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The biologic error in gestational length related to the use of the first day of last menstrual period as a proxy for the start of pregnancy.
    Nakling J; Buhaug H; Backe B
    Early Hum Dev; 2005 Oct; 81(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 16084037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Last menstrual period provides the best estimate of gestation length for women in rural Guatemala.
    Neufeld LM; Haas JD; Grajéda R; Martorell R
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 20(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 16879501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates.
    Morin I; Morin L; Zhang X; Platt RW; Blondel B; Bréart G; Usher R; Kramer MS
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 15663577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of recalled date of last menstrual period with prospectively recorded dates.
    Wegienka G; Baird DD
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Apr; 14(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 15857271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation between last-menstrual-period and clinical estimates of gestational age in vital records.
    Qin C; Hsia J; Berg CJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 167(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 18182378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimated date of delivery from last menstrual period and ultrasound scan: which is more accurate?
    Rowlands S; Royston P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Aug; 43(373):322-5. PubMed ID: 8251215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the modified Ballard method of assessing gestational age perform well in a Zimbabwean population?
    Feresu SA
    Cent Afr J Med; 2003; 49(9-10):97-103. PubMed ID: 15298463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the quality of last menstrual period date on California birth records.
    Pearl M; Wier ML; Kharrazi M
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():50-61. PubMed ID: 17803618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gestational age estimates from singleton births conceived using assisted reproductive technology.
    Callaghan WM; Schieve LA; Dietz PM
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():79-85. PubMed ID: 17803621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Prolonged pregnancy in relation to the last menstrual period].
    Usandizaga M
    Acta Obstet Ginecol Hisp Lusit; 1970 Apr; 18(2):61-100. PubMed ID: 5501613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dating of pregnancy: time to forget the last menstrual period.
    Gardosi J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):367-8. PubMed ID: 9239819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.
    Dietz PM; England LJ; Callaghan WM; Pearl M; Wier ML; Kharrazi M
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():62-71. PubMed ID: 17803619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as post-term according to the last menstrual period estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10461332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal gender and sonographic assessment of crown-rump length: implications for multifetal pregnancy reduction.
    Becker S; Ural S; Fehm T; Bienstock J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 24(4):399-401. PubMed ID: 15343593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17,450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule?
    Nguyen TH; Larsen T; Engholm G; Møller H
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 10461334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome.
    Oh JS; Wright G; Coulam CB
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12230450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of gestational age by sonographic measurement of fetal parameters in women in eastern Nepal with existing standard normograms.
    Karki DB; Sharma U; Rauniyar RK
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2006 Sep; 8(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 17203824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. United States vital statistics and the measurement of gestational age.
    Martin JA
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():13-21. PubMed ID: 17803614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gestational age assessment. II. Prediction from combined clinical observations.
    Andersen HF; Johnson TR; Flora JD; Barclay ML
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Aug; 140(7):770-4. PubMed ID: 7258258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.