These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7245562)
1. Development of seamless tri-leaflet valves. Russell FB; Lederman DM; Singh PI; Cumming RD; Morgan RA; Levine FH; Austen WG; Buckley MJ Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1980; 26():66-71. PubMed ID: 7245562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position. Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 15144993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro function and durability of a polyurethane heart valve: material considerations. Bernacca GM; Mackay TG; Wheatley DJ J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Sep; 5(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 8894995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new design for polyurethane heart valves. Butterfield M; Wheatley DJ; Williams DF; Fisher J J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 11206756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Novel "biomechanical" polymeric valve prostheses with special design for aortic and mitral position: a future option for pediatric patients? Sachweh JS; Daebritz SH ASAIO J; 2006; 52(5):575-80. PubMed ID: 16966862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses. Fann JI; Miller DC Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study. Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early experience with the new Masters series of St. Jude Medical heart valve: in vivo hemodynamic and clinical results in patients with narrowed aortic annulus. Zingg U; Aeschbacher B; Seiler C; Althaus U; Carrel T J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Sep; 6(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 9330177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of transprosthetic mean pressure gradients between Medtronic Hall and ATS valves in the aortic position. Sung K; Park PW; Park KH; Jun TG; Lee YT; Yang JH Int J Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 99(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15721496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep]. Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-vitro calcification study of polyurethane heart valves. Boloori Zadeh P; Corbett SC; Nayeb-Hashemi H Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Feb; 35():335-40. PubMed ID: 24411385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High concordance of invasive and echocardiographic mean pressure gradients in patients with a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. Knebel F; Gliech V; Walde T; Eddicks S; Konertz W; Baumann G; Borges AC J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 May; 14(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 15974527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of eight prosthetic aortic valves in a cadaver model. Youdelman BA; Hirose H; Jain H; Kresh JY; Entwistle JW; Wechsler AS J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 134(6):1526-32. PubMed ID: 18023677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]