These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7246092)

  • 1. Osteogenic phenomena across endosteal bone-implant spaces with porous surfaced intramedullary implants.
    Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Weatherly GC
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1981; 52(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 7246092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threaded versus porous-surfaced designs for implant stabilization in bone-endodontic implant model.
    Maniatopoulos C; Pilliar RM; Smith DC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1986; 20(9):1309-33. PubMed ID: 3782184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants.
    Dalton JE; Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 7822360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Osteogenesis and morphology of the peri-implant bone facing dental implants.
    Franchi M; Orsini E; Trire A; Quaranta M; Martini D; Piccari GG; Ruggeri A; Ottani V
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2004 Dec; 4():1083-95. PubMed ID: 15632988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tissue response to porous-coated implants lacking initial bone apposition.
    Sandborn PM; Cook SD; Spires WP; Kester MA
    J Arthroplasty; 1988; 3(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 3241171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of porous surface configuration on the tensile strength of fixation of implants by bone ingrowth.
    Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Weatherly GC; Kent GM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980 Jun; (149):291-8. PubMed ID: 7408314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implant-delivered Alendronate Causes a Dose-dependent Response on Net Bone Formation Around Porous Titanium Implants in Canines.
    Pura JA; Bobyn JD; Tanzer M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May; 474(5):1224-33. PubMed ID: 26831478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The susceptibility of smooth implant surfaces to periimplant fibrosis and migration of polyethylene wear debris.
    Bobyn JD; Jacobs JJ; Tanzer M; Urban RM; Aribindi R; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Brooks CE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Feb; (311):21-39. PubMed ID: 7634577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of sol-gel-formed calcium phosphate coatings on bone ingrowth and osteoconductivity of porous-surfaced Ti alloy implants.
    Nguyen HQ; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Valiquette N; Yakubovich R
    Biomaterials; 2004 Feb; 25(5):865-76. PubMed ID: 14609675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions.
    Jasty M; Bragdon C; Burke D; O'Connor D; Lowenstein J; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 May; 79(5):707-14. PubMed ID: 9160943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of replacement prostheses for segmental defects of bone. Different porous coatings for extracortical fixation.
    Okada Y; Suka T; Sim FH; Gorski JP; Chao EY
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1988 Feb; 70(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 3343260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The bone-implant interface of femoral stems with non-circumferential porous coating.
    Urban RM; Jacobs JJ; Sumner DR; Peters CL; Voss FR; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):1068-81. PubMed ID: 8698725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal fixation of implants by bone ingrowth into surface pores.
    Martens M; Ducheyne P; De Meester P; Mulier JC
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978); 1980; 97(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7458596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone remodeling associated with a flexible femoral intramedullary implant.
    Luedemann RE; Thomas KA; Cook SD
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1986; 14(3-4):181-94. PubMed ID: 3814713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants.
    Pilliar RM; Lee JM; Maniatopoulos C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Jul; (208):108-13. PubMed ID: 3720113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone.
    Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Weatherly GC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (150):263-70. PubMed ID: 7428231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiographic and histologic evaluation of intramedullary implants intended for biological fixation.
    Luedemann RE; Cook SD
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1983; 11(2-3):197-210. PubMed ID: 6667324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary observations of bone ingrowth into porous materials.
    Robertson DM; Pierre L; Chahal R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1976 May; 10(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 1270453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Powder metal-made orthopedic implants with porous surface for fixation by tissue ingrowth.
    Pilliar RM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Jun; (176):42-51. PubMed ID: 6851341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhanced stabilization of porous-coated metal implants with tricalcium phosphate granules.
    Eschenroeder HC; McLaughlin RE; Reger SI
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Mar; (216):234-46. PubMed ID: 3815952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.