These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

41 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7246110)

  • 1. Analytical considerations of the mechanical stem-femur coupling.
    Barberi G; Gola M; Gugliotta A; Calderale PM
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1980; 46(6):728-34. PubMed ID: 7246110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of a physiological hip prosthesis: evaluation of the strains after implantation of a prototype of hip implant: experiment in a dry femur.
    Vander Sloten J; Labey L; Van Audekercke R; Van der Perre G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1993; 3(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8490530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mechanical behavior of the upper epiphysis of the resurfaced femur and incidence of anatomical variations and various cup types].
    Crick D; Wagner J; Bourgois R; Dehu P
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1985; 51(2-3):168-80. PubMed ID: 4050374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical simulator for the upper femur.
    Munting E; Verhelpen M
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 8372646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in-vitro investigation of the CPS-Plus femoral stem: influence of the proximal centraliser on cement pressurisation during stem insertion.
    Gozzard C; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW; Learmonth ID
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Apr; 74(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 12807321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretical and experimental studies of femoral stresses following surface replacement hip arthroplasty.
    Shybut GT; Askew MJ; Hori RY; Stulberg SD
    Proc Inst Med Chic; 1980; 33(3):95-106. PubMed ID: 7433457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of femoral stem cross-sectional geometry on cement stresses in total hip reconstruction.
    Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Johnston RC; Milroy JC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (146):71-7. PubMed ID: 7371271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.
    Long JP; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():115-22. PubMed ID: 17016222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.
    Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Otto Aufranc Award Paper. An analysis of femoral prosthesis design: the effects on proximal femur loading.
    Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Johnston RC; Pedersen DR
    Hip; 1981; ():111-22. PubMed ID: 7333883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strain distribution in the proximal human femur.
    Leali A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2002 Jan; 84(1):148. PubMed ID: 11837822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of design parameters on calcar stresses following femoral head arthroplasty.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Mar; 14(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 7358741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative biomechanical examinations of conventional implants and of hip joint implant without cement fixation.
    Engelhardt A; Grell H; Roehrle H; Scholten R; Just D
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1980; 46(6):742-54. PubMed ID: 7246112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Critique and results of the hip prosthesis with an external cortical femoral support. Apropos of Y. Cirotteau's paper. June 28, 1989 meeting].
    Barbin JY
    Chirurgie; 1989; 115(7):476-9. PubMed ID: 2632158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Letter of apology: Risk factors affecting the outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip.
    Beaulé PE; Amstutz HC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Jun; (435):278. PubMed ID: 15930954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fatigue performance of composite analogue femur constructs under high activity loading.
    Chong AC; Friis EA; Ballard GP; Czuwala PJ; Cooke FW
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 35(7):1196-205. PubMed ID: 17390224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Torsional fixation of a modular femoral hip component.
    Ohl MD; Whiteside LA; McCarthy DS; White SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Feb; (287):135-41. PubMed ID: 8448932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Anatomical and extensometric study concerning the collar support and the prosthetic sleeve. Basis of the conception of an anatomic prosthesis].
    Blaimont P; Delronge G; Smeyers B; Halleux P; Lasudry N; Sintzoff S
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():170-81. PubMed ID: 8116395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.