These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7246629)

  • 1. Oxytocin challenge test and intrauterine growth retardation.
    Lin CC; Devoe LD; River P; Moawad AH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jun; 140(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 7246629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relations between fetal brain-sparing circulation, oxytocin challenge test, mode of delivery and fetal outcome in growth-restricted term fetuses.
    Fu J; Olofsson P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Mar; 90(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 21306309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An OCT-reactivity classification to predict fetal outcome.
    Lin CC; Moawad AH; River P; Pishotta FT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jul; 56(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 7383482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing in preterm pregnancy.
    Devoe LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Oct; 60(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 7121929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oxytocin challenge test in high-risk pregnancy.
    Farahani G; Vasudeva K; Petrie R; Fenton AN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Feb; 47(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 1250537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive value of antepartum fetal heart rate non-stress test in high-risk pregnancy.
    Lenstrup C; Haase N
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1985; 64(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 3984690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A study on the relation among oxytocin challenge test, maternal serum estriol level and placental change (author's transl)].
    Sawazumi K; Tonari M; Sakai K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1982 May; 34(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 7086240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The predictive value of fetal heart rate monitoring: a retrospective analysis of 2165 high-risk pregnancies.
    Ocak V; Demirkíran F; Sen C; Colgar U; Oçer F; Kilavuz O; Uras Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1992 Mar; 44(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 1587368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the nonstress test, oxytocin challenge test, Doppler velocimetry and biophysical profile in predicting umbilical vein pH in growth-retarded fetuses.
    Shalev E; Zalel Y; Weiner E
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Oct; 43(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 7904948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Non-reactive pattern diagnosed by ultrasonic Doppler fetal actocardiogram and outcome of the fetuses with non-reactive pattern].
    Teshima N
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 May; 45(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 8496632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The significance of fetal heart rate decelerations during nonstress testing.
    Bourgeois FJ; Thiagarajah S; Harbert GM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 150(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 6476042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical implications of prospective antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Devoe LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(8):983-90. PubMed ID: 7405996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bioelectric evaluation in intrauterine growth retardation.
    Cetrulo CL; Freeman R
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Dec; 20(4):979-89. PubMed ID: 606456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Doppler sonography of the umbilical artery: differential diagnosis in intrauterine growth retardation].
    Weiss E; Hitschold T; Müntefering H; Berle P
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 May; 49(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 2661313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Obstetric management of the growth retarded baby.
    Simpson GF; Creasy RK
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Aug; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 6383686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pregnancy outcome in the patient with a nonreactive nonstress test and a positive contraction stress test.
    Slomka C; Phelan JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jan; 139(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 7457512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal surveillance in diabetic pregnancy. II. The nonstress test versus the oxytocin challenge test.
    Olofsson P; Sjöberg NO; Solum T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 3739648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. False negative oxytocin challenge test.
    Marcum RG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Apr; 127(8):894. PubMed ID: 851153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The nonstress test: an evaluation of 1,000 patients.
    Barrett JM; Salyer SL; Boehm FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Sep; 141(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 7282790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic monitoring evidence of fetal distress in high-risk pregnancies.
    Peck T
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Mar; 24(3):103-8. PubMed ID: 7373591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.