BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7248145)

  • 1. Cell electrophoresis for diagnostic purposes. II. Critical evaluation of conventional cytopherometry.
    Hoffmann W; Kaufmann R; Steiner R; Werner W
    Br J Cancer; 1981 May; 43(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 7248145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The applications and techniques of cell electrophoresis and the Zeiss rectangular chamber cytopherometer.
    Young RA
    Biomed Eng; 1976 Nov; 11(11):373-7. PubMed ID: 990359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A laser Doppler cytopherometer for measurement of electrophoretic mobility of bioparticles.
    Preece AW; Luckman NP
    Phys Med Biol; 1981 Jan; 26(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 7017768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The analysis of the red cell unsaturated fatty acid test for multiple sclerosis using laser cytopherometry.
    Jones R; Preece AW; Luckman NP; Forrester JA
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 Oct; 28(10):1145-51. PubMed ID: 6647546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvements of the electrophoretic mobility test to measure lymphocyte sensitization.
    Zwergel T; Nitzschke U; Franke F; Lampert F
    Microsc Acta; 1978 Jul; 80(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 692441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cell electrophoresis for diagnostic purposes. I. Diagnostic value of the electrophoretic mobility test (EMT) for the detection of gynaecological malignancies.
    Hoffmann W; Werner W; Steiner R; Kaufmann R
    Br J Cancer; 1981 May; 43(5):588-97. PubMed ID: 6166306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the erythrocyte-UFA (E-UFA) mobility test for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Cuypers J; Reddemann H
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1980 Nov; 43(11):995-8. PubMed ID: 7441283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Experiences with the electrophoretic mobility test in children. A diagnostic help in pediatric oncology? (author's transl)].
    Ritter J; Oehme J
    Monatsschr Kinderheilkd (1902); 1978 Sep; 126(9):556-60. PubMed ID: 80743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvement of the electrophoretic mobility test to measure lymphocyte sensitization.
    Zwergel T; Zwergel U; Bichler KH
    Urol Int; 1981; 36(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 7331053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Analytical microelectrophoresis of cells and the means for using it in oncological research].
    Novichenko NL; Struk VI
    Eksp Onkol; 1985; 7(3):21-6, 30. PubMed ID: 3893971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controlling two-dimensional tethered vesicle motion using an electric field: interplay of electrophoresis and electro-osmosis.
    Yoshina-Ishii C; Boxer SG
    Langmuir; 2006 Feb; 22(5):2384-91. PubMed ID: 16489833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Macrophage electrophoretic mobility test (MEM) and tanned erythrocyte electrophoretic mobility test (TEEM) for cancer diagnosis (author's transl)].
    Zhao BH; Hu JK; Liang JX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1979; 1(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 553795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Application of 2 electrophoresis techniques to the analysis of erythrocyte membrane proteins in hereditary spherocytosis].
    Ferrándiz F; Ródenas S; Villegas A
    Sangre (Barc); 1993 Oct; 38(5):393-7. PubMed ID: 8140503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An assessment of the macrophage electrophoretic mobility test (MEM) in cancer diagnosis.
    Crozier EH; Hollinger ME; Woodend BE; Robertson JH
    J Clin Pathol; 1976 Jul; 29(7):608-9. PubMed ID: 988059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Photographic evaluation of the electrophoretic mobility test. A modification].
    Wagner G; Winter G
    Onkologie; 1982 Jun; 5(3):135-44. PubMed ID: 6750483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dependence of the electroosmotic mobility on the applied electric field and its reproducibility in capillary electrophoresis.
    Bello MS; Capelli L; Righetti PG
    J Chromatogr A; 1994 Nov; 684(2):311-22. PubMed ID: 7987479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cytopherometry in neurologic diseases (author's transl)].
    Meyer-Rienecker HJ; Jenssen HL; Köhler H; Werner H
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr Grenzgeb; 1977 Nov; 45(11):615-29. PubMed ID: 336499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential Mobility of Breast Cancer Cells and Normal Breast Epithelial Cells Under DC Electrophoresis and Electroosmosis.
    Dutta D; Russell C; Kim J; Chandra S
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Oct; 38(10):5733-5738. PubMed ID: 30275194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communication: The phoretic drift of a charged particle animated by a direct ionic current.
    Yariv E
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Sep; 133(12):121102. PubMed ID: 20886916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical aspects of the macrophage electrophoretic mobility (MEM) test for malignant disease.
    Pritchard JA; Moore JL; Sutherland WH; Joslin CA
    Br J Cancer Suppl; 1973 Aug; 1():229-36. PubMed ID: 4804283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.