These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7249623)

  • 21. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
    Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interference of the position of substances in an epicutaneous patch test battery with the occurrence of false-positive results.
    Duarte I; Lazzarini R; Buense R
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Sep; 13(3):125-32. PubMed ID: 12165931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patch testing with European and American standard allergens in Japanese patients.
    Hirano S; Yoshikawa K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1982 Jan; 8(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 7067439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. White petrolatum (Ph. Eur.) is virtually non-sensitizing. Analysis of IVDK data on 80 000 patients tested between 1992 and 2004 and short discussion of identification and designation of allergens.
    Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Geier J; Uter W
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jun; 54(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 16787456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Repetitive skin testing in patients with lower leg eczema and leg ulcer].
    Lindemayr H; Drobil M
    Z Hautkr; 1983 Jun; 58(11):807-19. PubMed ID: 6880331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of meteorological conditions on patch test results with 12 standard series allergens (fragrances, biocides, topical ingredients).
    Uter W; Hegewald J; Kränke B; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
    Br J Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 158(4):734-9. PubMed ID: 18284398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Positive Multi-Test reactions do not cause false positive reactions at adjacent sites.
    Garibaldi E; Slavin RG
    Ann Allergy; 1990 Dec; 65(6):481-4. PubMed ID: 2256578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of A1-test and Finn chamber test.
    Peltonen L
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Jul; 7(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 7326923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The disturbance of epidermal barrier function in atopy patch test reactions in atopic eczema.
    Gfesser M; Rakoski J; Ring J
    Br J Dermatol; 1996 Oct; 135(4):560-5. PubMed ID: 8915146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ring-shaped positive allergic patch test reactions to allergens in liquid vehicles.
    Lachapelle JM; Tennstedt D; Fyad A; Masmoudi ML; Nouaigui H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Apr; 18(4):234-6. PubMed ID: 3378431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Concomitant positive patch test results with standard screening tray in North America 1985-1989.
    Holness DL; Nethercott JR; Adams RM; Belsito D; Deleo V; Emmett EA; Fowler J; Fisher AA; Larsen WG; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 May; 32(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 7634783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The prevention and management of the angry back (excited skin syndrome [ESS]) in patch testing: Part II.
    Fisher AA
    Cutis; 1997 Jan; 59(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 9013064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Interpretation and relevance of patch testing: false-positive and false-negative test reactions, compound allergy, cross-sensitivity].
    Le Coz CJ; Sasseville D
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2009; 136(8-9):610-6. PubMed ID: 19686897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contact allergy to aeroallergens in children with atopic dermatitis: comparison with allergic contact dermatitis.
    Cabon N; Ducombs G; Mortureux P; Perromat M; Taieb A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jul; 35(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 8896951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. European multicenter study of TRUE Test, Panel 2.
    Wilkinson JD; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Frosch PJ; Gunnarsson Y; Hannuksela M; Lachapelle JM; Ring J; Shaw S; White IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Apr; 22(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 2189668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Results of patch testing with a special series of rubber allergens.
    Holness DL; Nethercott JR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Apr; 36(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9165204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Epicutaneous testing with a standard series. Results in 12,026 patients].
    Enders F; Przybilla B; Ring J; Burg G; Braun-Falco O
    Hautarzt; 1988 Dec; 39(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 2976753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. European multicenter study of the TRUE Test.
    Lachapelle JM; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Hannuksela M; Ring J; White IR; Wilkinson J; Fischer T; Billberg K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 3180789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 'Angry back syndrome': a non-reproducible phenomenon.
    Memon AA; Friedmann PS
    Br J Dermatol; 1996 Dec; 135(6):924-30. PubMed ID: 8977713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.