These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 725008)

  • 1. The quality of the diagnostic image.
    Healey T
    Radiography; 1978 Oct; 44(526):241-6. PubMed ID: 725008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display.
    Krupinski EA; Williams MB; Andriole K; Strauss KJ; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA; ; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 17544140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Krupinski EA; Strauss KJ; Breeden WK; Rzeszotarski MS; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):371-88. PubMed ID: 17544139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of technical conditions on the informative value of the image in radiography with the aid of electron-optic amplifier (experimental study)].
    Telichko FF; Matula P
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1977; (1):76-80. PubMed ID: 867795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kudos for chest radiography article.
    Adkins M
    Radiol Technol; 2000; 72(1):10. PubMed ID: 11019402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital mammography image quality: image display.
    Siegel E; Krupinski E; Samei E; Flynn M; Andriole K; Erickson B; Thomas J; Badano A; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27. PubMed ID: 17412136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Technical factors, quality control, relevance of doctor's statements (author's transl)].
    Lissner J
    Rontgenblatter; 1979 Nov; 32(11):581-90. PubMed ID: 515649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose and quality control (DQC) in diagnostic radiology.
    Holloway AF; Taylor KW; Hobbs BB
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Jun; 35(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 6480667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Device for improving quality of bedside decubitus examinations.
    Colley DP; Sherman RJ
    Radiol Technol; 1979; 51(1):88. PubMed ID: 472228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of modern intensifying screens in diagnostic radiology.
    Skucas J; Gorski J
    Med Radiogr Photogr; 1980; 56(2):25-36. PubMed ID: 7453496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Principles of improving and controlling physico-technical conditions of roentgenodiagnostic examinations].
    Gurvich AM
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1984; (5):75-80. PubMed ID: 6528467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital systems require x-ray charts too.
    Eastman TR
    Radiol Technol; 1996; 67(4):354. PubMed ID: 8778917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [DIN 6868: a standard series for assuring image quality in roentgen diagnostic services].
    Kütterer G
    Rontgenpraxis; 1987 Feb; 40(2):42. PubMed ID: 3576370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The Rentgen-40 roentgen diagnostic apparatus].
    Sosnin FR; Ivanov IuG; Khaĭrulin AA; Chuliukov GM; Shvartsman AS
    Med Tekh; 1988; (3):13-7. PubMed ID: 3419306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comments on the standards for acceptance and consistency testing of systems for digital radiography].
    Schätzl M; Braunschweig R; Hoppe T; Lenzen H; Schenk H; Schramm H; Streng W; von Volkmann T; Kamm KF
    Rofo; 2005 Sep; 177(9):1297-304. PubMed ID: 16123878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Best Practices in Digital Radiography.
    DeMaio DN; Herrmann T; Noble LB; Orth D; Peterson P; Young J; Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2019 Nov; 91(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 31685600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Determination of an optimum enlargement factor by means of objective or subjective criteria of picture quality (author's transl)].
    Rosenkranz G; Platzbecker H; Köhler K
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1975; 16(3):429-35. PubMed ID: 1215509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital radiography with phosphor plates.
    Hayden L; Nilges E
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Apr; 10(4):44-7. PubMed ID: 10111471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Display monitors for digital medical imaging.
    Andriole KP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 17411873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.