These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7252451)

  • 1. A two-phase study of the reliability of computerized morbidity data.
    Fortinsky RH; Gutman JD
    J Fam Pract; 1981 Aug; 13(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 7252451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodological, technical, and ethical issues of a computerized data system.
    Rice CA; Godkin MA; Catlin RJ
    J Fam Pract; 1980 Jun; 10(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 7373256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Completeness and accuracy of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on general practice computers in Scotland.
    Whitelaw FG; Nevin SL; Milne RM; Taylor RJ; Taylor MW; Watt AH
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Mar; 46(404):181-6. PubMed ID: 8731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district?
    Scobie S; Basnett I; McCartney P
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 8639350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of the medical record credential on data quality.
    Green E; Benjamin C
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Nov; 57(11):29-38. PubMed ID: 10280223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benchmarking variation in coding accuracy across the United States.
    Lorence DP; Ibrahim IA
    J Health Care Finance; 2003; 29(4):29-42. PubMed ID: 12908652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sending specialist reports to GPs using EDI.
    Kooijman CJ; Kaag ME
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():408-11. PubMed ID: 10384488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodology to improve data quality from chart review in the managed care setting.
    Cassidy LD; Marsh GM; Holleran MK; Ruhl LS
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 8(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 12234019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems.
    Hamilton WT; Round AP; Sharp D; Peters TJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Dec; 53(497):929-33; discussion 933. PubMed ID: 14960216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manager's reports of variation in coding accuracy across U.S. oncology centers.
    Lorence DP; Spink A; Jameson R
    J Oncol Manag; 2002; 11(6):20-6. PubMed ID: 12502289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wells S; Cooper A; Harvey M; Brew S; Wright M
    Public Health; 2003 Nov; 117(6):438-45. PubMed ID: 14522160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of morbidity data in family practice.
    Anderson JE
    J Fam Pract; 1980 Apr; 10(4):677-83. PubMed ID: 7365441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The loss of reliability in data extraction from clinical histories: the source of the flaws and the usefulness of training].
    Gómez de la Cámara A; Ciruelo Monge E; de la Cruz Bértolo J; Serrano Díaz JM; Pato Cour E; Gómez-Reino Carnota JJ
    Med Clin (Barc); 1997 Mar; 108(10):377-81. PubMed ID: 9139144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the effectiveness of 2 educational interventions in family practice.
    Borgiel AE; Williams JI; Davis DA; Dunn EV; Hobbs N; Hutchison B; Wilson CR; Jensen J; O'Neil JJ; Bass MJ
    CMAJ; 1999 Oct; 161(8):965-70. PubMed ID: 10551192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 21st-century health care: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clinic.
    Garrison GM; Bernard ME; Rasmussen NH
    Fam Med; 2002 May; 34(5):362-8. PubMed ID: 12038718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a computer tracking program for resident-patient encounters.
    Rowe BH; Ryan DT; Mulloy JV
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Dec; 41():2113-20. PubMed ID: 8680294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The completeness and accuracy of patient record transfer between practices.
    Sullivan F; Wilson P
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1997 Jan; 55(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 9090174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Waikato Medical Care (WaiMedCa) Survey 1991-1992.
    McAvoy B; Davis P; Raymont A; Gribben B
    N Z Med J; 1994 Sep; 107(986 Pt 2):388-433. PubMed ID: 7936474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality and variability of osteoporosis data in general practice computer records: implications for disease registers.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wood O; Hague N; Valentin T; Van Vlymen J
    Public Health; 2005 Sep; 119(9):771-80. PubMed ID: 15893348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.