These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Malignant melanoma prognostic factors 1: use of photography. Day CL; Lew RA; Sober AJ J Dermatol Surg Oncol; 1983 May; 9(5):364-7. PubMed ID: 6841787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The New American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma: a critical analysis based on data of the German Central Malignant Melanoma Registry. Garbe C; Ellwanger U; Tronnier M; Brocker EB; Orfanos CE Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2305-7. PubMed ID: 12001131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital monitoring by whole body photography and sequential digital dermoscopy detects thinner melanomas. Rademaker M; Oakley A J Prim Health Care; 2010 Dec; 2(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 21125066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Prognostic evaluation of malignant melanoma]. Schmoeckel C; Bockelbrink A; Bockelbrink H; Braun-Falco O Med Klin Prax; 1982 Sep; 77(19):50-1. PubMed ID: 7132900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The new melanoma staging system: what the clinician should know. Doshi DN; Friedman AJ J Drugs Dermatol; 2010 Aug; 9(8):1029-32. PubMed ID: 20684159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Malignant melanoma. Prediction of metastasis and survival based on gross anatomic characteristics. Long RT J Med Assoc State Ala; 1979 Jul; 49(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 469435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Skin lesions suspected to be melanoma should be photographed. Gross morphological features of primary melanoma associated with metastases. Day CL; Mihm MC; Sober AJ; Fitzpatrick TB; Malt RA; Kopf AW; Lew RA; Harrist TJ JAMA; 1982 Sep; 248(9):1077-81. PubMed ID: 7109200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]