These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7254431)

  • 1. Chemical carcinogens: screening, testing, risk assessment for man.
    Schramm T; Teichmann B
    Neoplasma; 1981; 28(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 7254431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing of chemicals for carcinogenic activities and some problems related to the assessment of carcinogenic risks to men.
    Schramm T; Teichmann B
    Pol J Pharmacol Pharm; 1979; 31(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 550120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Screening of chemicals and tests for carcinogenicity - part of comprehensive toxicological investigation].
    Schramm T; Teichmann B
    Nahrung; 1981; 25(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 7242655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The significance of in-vitro tests with respect to testing of substances for carcinogenic activities (author's transl)].
    Schramm T; Teichmann B; Butschak G
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1977; 47(6):567-80. PubMed ID: 415699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The animal experiment in toxicology. Current situation and further development].
    Bolt HM
    Fortschr Med; 1979 Aug; 97(30-31):1329-31. PubMed ID: 468095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-term tests in assessment of cancer risks and in primary prevention of occupational cancer.
    Schramm T
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1982; 52(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 7044339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chemicals causing mammary gland tumors in animals signal new directions for epidemiology, chemicals testing, and risk assessment for breast cancer prevention.
    Rudel RA; Attfield KR; Schifano JN; Brody JG
    Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12 Suppl):2635-66. PubMed ID: 17503434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity guidelines.
    Page NP
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1977; 1(2):161-82. PubMed ID: 553129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An overview of short-term tests for the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of pesticides.
    Waters MD; Simmon VF; Mitchell AD; Jorgenson TA; Valencia R
    J Environ Sci Health B; 1980; 15(6):867-906. PubMed ID: 7002991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neonatal mouse assay for tumorigenicity: alternative to the chronic rodent bioassay.
    Flammang TJ; Tungeln LS; Kadlubar FF; Fu PP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 9356286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
    Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
    Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Animal carcinogenicity studies: implications for the REACH system.
    Knight A; Bailey J; Balcombe J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():139-47. PubMed ID: 16555967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carcinogenic chemical-response "fingerprint" for male F344 rats exposed to a series of 195 chemicals: implications for predicting carcinogens with transgenic models.
    Johnson FM
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):234-45. PubMed ID: 10618171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal.
    O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision of estimates of an ADI (or TDI or PTWI).
    Speijers GJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S87-93. PubMed ID: 10597619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.