These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Participation of the callosal system in the process of signal discrimination from noise]. Bianki VL; Shurgaia GG; Koroleva IV Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1980 Nov; 66(11):1617-25. PubMed ID: 7439451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Laterality effects in normal subjects: evidence for interhemispheric interactions. Bryden MP; Bulman-Fleming MB Behav Brain Res; 1994 Oct; 64(1-2):119-29. PubMed ID: 7840878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preferred hand and familial sinistrality in dichotic monitoring. Geffen G; Traub E Neuropsychologia; 1979; 17(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 514488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Recognition of dichotic melodies by musicians and nonmusicians. Zatorre RJ Neuropsychologia; 1979; 17(6):607-17. PubMed ID: 522974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Characteristics of human auditory evoked potentials during lateralization of a "moving" acoustic pattern]. Al'tman IaA; Belov IM; Vaĭtulevich SF; Mal'tseva NV Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1982; 32(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 7113449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal dynamics of selective attention during dichotic listening. Ross B; Hillyard SA; Picton TW Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1360-71. PubMed ID: 19789185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interhemispheric functional asymmetry of auditory evoked potentials in young children. Zmanovskii YuF ; Ibatullina AA Hum Physiol; 1983; 9(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 6677569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal structure model of binaural masking level difference. Albeck Y; Nebenzahl I; Lewis A J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1389-93. PubMed ID: 1401525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Verbal and nonverbal dichotic listening test. Influence of the hemispheric activation state in normal subjects]. Larmande P; Elghozi D; Bigot T; Sintes J; Autret A Rev Neurol (Paris); 1983; 139(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 6857089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective auditory attention and early event-related potentials: a rejoinder. Hillyard SA Can J Psychol; 1981 Jun; 35(2):159-74. PubMed ID: 7248849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dichotic listening during forced-attention in a patient with left hemispherectomy. Wester K; Hugdahl K; Asbjørnsen A Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Feb; 72(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 2038510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central auditory processing. VI. Detecting ear dominance by evoked potentials. Efron R; Snyder E; Yund EW; Martin F Brain Lang; 1983 Sep; 20(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 6626945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemispheric specialization and attention: effects of complete and partial callosal section and hemispherectomy on dichotic monitoring. Wale J; Geffen G Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(4):483-96. PubMed ID: 3774134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Lateral differences in the dynamics of latent periods of a simple motor response to acoustic stimuli of increasing intensity]. Vol'f NV; Tsvetovskiĭ SB Fiziol Cheloveka; 1985; 11(6):989-92. PubMed ID: 4076695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemispheric specialization and ear advantages in processing speech. Geffen G; Quinn K Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):273-91. PubMed ID: 6385045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech dominance is a better predictor of functional brain asymmetry than handedness: a combined fMRI word generation and behavioral dichotic listening study. Van der Haegen L; Westerhausen R; Hugdahl K; Brysbaert M Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jan; 51(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 23149380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]