These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7254733)

  • 1. Fetal versus maternal rights: medical and legal perspectives.
    Bowes WA; Selgestad B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Aug; 58(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 7254733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. She's going to die: the case of Angela C.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 3350646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority: court-ordered surgery to protect the life of an unborn child.
    Finamore EP
    Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):83-101. PubMed ID: 6638020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forced cesareans: the most unkindest cut of all.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):16-7, 45. PubMed ID: 7107234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Court ordered obstetric intervention: a commentary.
    Brenner B; Burnet P
    N Z Med J; 1995 Oct; 108(1010):431-2. PubMed ID: 7478347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Court-ordered cesarean sections. A judicial standard for resolving the conflict between fetal interests and maternal rights.
    Noble-Allgire AM
    J Leg Med; 1989 Mar; 10(1):211-49. PubMed ID: 2651546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal versus fetal rights--a clinical dilemma.
    Shriner TL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 53(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 440658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Court-ordered surgery for the protection of a viable fetus: Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority, 247 Ga. 86, 274 S.E.2d 457 (1981).
    Manner RL
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1982; 5(1):125-48. PubMed ID: 11649638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fetal right to live.
    Leiberman JR; Mazor M; Chaim W; Cohen A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 53(4):515-7. PubMed ID: 440657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forensic implications and medical-legal dilemmas of maternal versus fetal rights.
    Mohaupt SM; Sharma KK
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):985-92. PubMed ID: 9729816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making.
    Stanyer BT
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal-fetal conflict: a study of physician concerns in court-ordered cesarean sections.
    Elkins TE; Brown D; Barclay M; Andersen HF
    J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 2131088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lack of consent although informed: fetal neglect.
    Reece SA; Reece EA
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 11649199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
    Cooper R
    Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re S (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment).
    Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Oct; [1992]4():671-2. PubMed ID: 11648229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
    Barber RA
    Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Court-ordered cesarean section: an analysis of ethical concerns in compelling cases.
    Elkins TE; Andersen HF; Barclay M; Mason T; Bowdler N; Anderson G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 161(1):150-4. PubMed ID: 2750796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
    Warren MA
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A realistic approach to maternal-fetal conflict.
    Hornstra D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 11656772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.