132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7256312)
1. The use of medical services under prepaid and fee-for-service group practice.
Scitovsky AA
Soc Sci Med Med Econ; 1981 Jun; 15(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 7256312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in medical care costs. Do HMOs lower the rate of growth?
Luft HS
Med Care; 1980 Jan; 18(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 7354668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of hospital services under two prepaid plans.
Scitovsky AA; McCall N
Med Care; 1980 Jan; 18(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 7354672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prepaid medical practice: a summary of findings from a recent survey of group practices in the United States. A comparison of fee-for-service and prepaid groups.
Held PJ; Reinhardt UE
Group Health J; 1980; 1(2):4-15. PubMed ID: 10247922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fee-for-service versus prepaid group practice and longitudinal effects in utilization.
Beck RG; Horne JM
Med Care; 1981 Jul; 19(7):759-65. PubMed ID: 7266122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Out-of-plan use under two prepaid plans.
Scitovsky AA; Benham L; McCall N
Med Care; 1981 Dec; 19(12):1165-93. PubMed ID: 7339306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health maintenance organizations.
Saward EW; Fleming S
Sci Am; 1980 Oct; 243(4):47-53. PubMed ID: 7423180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medicare capitation.
Carpenter RB
Healthc Forum; 1985; 28(5):39, 41, 43. PubMed ID: 10300328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Case mix in HMOs and fee-for-service systems: the ratio of routine visits to total visits in adult primary care.
Record JC; Blomquist RH; McCabe MA; McCally M; Berger BD
Soc Sci Med Med Econ; 1980 Dec; 14C(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 7466427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Community rating in the Kaiser-Permanente Medical Care Program.
Anderson RV; Auger N
Top Health Care Financ; 1981; 8(2):35-49. PubMed ID: 7034293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Some notes on the development of an IPA model HMO.
Savitz SA; Roberts PR
J Ambul Care Manage; 1986 May; 9(2):33-53. PubMed ID: 10275918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Union Health Service celebrates 50th year managing capitated patients.
Capitation Manag Rep; 2005 Apr; 12(4):39-43, 37. PubMed ID: 15913208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prepaid plans re-established in a fee-for-service group.
Hillmer HA
Med Group Manage; 1983; 30(6):18-22, 30. PubMed ID: 10264806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Price and membership in a prepaid group medical practice.
McGuire TG
Med Care; 1981 Feb; 19(2):172-83. PubMed ID: 7206850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in health maintenance organizations and fee-for-service practices.
Yelin EH; Henke CJ; Kramer JS; Nevitt MC; Shearn M; Epstein WV
N Engl J Med; 1985 Apr; 312(15):962-7. PubMed ID: 3974686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Membership duration and utilization rates in a prepaid group practice.
Griffith MJ; Baloff N
Med Care; 1981 Dec; 19(12):1194-210. PubMed ID: 7339307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health outcomes for a chronic disease in prepaid group practice and fee for service settings. The case of rheumatoid arthritis.
Yelin EH; Shearn MA; Epstein WV
Med Care; 1986 Mar; 24(3):236-47. PubMed ID: 3951265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Businesses brace for premium hikes as reform fever strikes California.
Carlson B
Manag Care; 1999 Sep; 8(9):18, 21. PubMed ID: 10621004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Calif. HMO switches to fee-for-service.
Bus Insur; 1979 Nov; 13(24):31. PubMed ID: 10244508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Health care utilization and outcomes among persons with rheumatoid arthritis in fee-for-service and prepaid group practice settings.
Yelin EH; Criswell LA; Feigenbaum PG
JAMA; 1996 Oct; 276(13):1048-53. PubMed ID: 8847766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]