108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7258856)
21. The relation of prognosis to the nuclear diameter of breast cancer cells obtained by cytologic aspiration.
Zajdela A; De LaRiva LS; Ghossein NA
Acta Cytol; 1979; 23(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 285555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computerized morphometric image analysis of cytologic nuclear parameters in breast cancer.
Wittekind C; Schulte E
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1987 Dec; 9(6):480-4. PubMed ID: 2829937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Argyrophilic nucleolar organiser regions (AgNORs) in breast lesions.
Dasgupta A; Ghosh RN; Sarkar R; Laha RN; Ghosh TK; Mukherjee C
J Indian Med Assoc; 1997 Sep; 95(9):492-4. PubMed ID: 9529579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Heterogeneous immunoreactivity of frozen human benign and malignant breast lesions to C-MYC and C-Ha-ras cellular oncogenes.
Pechoux C; Chardonnet Y; Chignol MC; Noël P
Histol Histopathol; 1994 Jan; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 8003818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cytochemistry of imprints from breast biopsies.
Johansen P; Thuen D
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 6166142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The glioblastoma multiforme and the metastatic carcinoma: a morphometric study of nuclear size and shape.
Giangaspero F; Muhlbaier LH; Burger PC
Appl Pathol; 1984; 2(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 6100539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of cytologic diagnoses made from touch imprints of image-guided needle biopsy specimens of nonpalpable breast abnormalities.
Sneige N; Tulbah A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 10907929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correlation of nuclear morphometry with pathologic parameters in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Tan PH; Goh BB; Chiang G; Bay BH
Mod Pathol; 2001 Oct; 14(10):937-41. PubMed ID: 11598161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Morphometry of isolated tumor cells in breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes: metastases or displacement?
van Deurzen CH; Bult P; de Boer M; Koelemij R; van Hillegersberg R; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Hobbelink MG; de Bruin PC; van Diest PJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 18852675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cathepsin D and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging gadolinium enhancement in malignant and benign breast lesions.
Stomper PC; Winston JS; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Blumenson LE
Clin Cancer Res; 1997 Apr; 3(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 9815720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.
Garg S; Mohan H; Bal A; Attri AK; Kochhar S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov; 35(11):681-9. PubMed ID: 17924407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Single cell multiple biomarker analysis in archival breast fine-needle aspiration specimens: quantitative fluorescence image analysis of DNA content, p53, and G-actin as breast cancer biomarkers.
Rao JY; Apple SK; Hemstreet GP; Jin Y; Nieberg RK
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1998 Nov; 7(11):1027-33. PubMed ID: 9829712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Expression and intranuclear distribution of nucleolin in estrogen receptor-negative and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers in women measured by laser scanning cytometry].
Masiuk M
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2006; 52(2):23-32. PubMed ID: 17633394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative nuclear morphometry by image analysis for prediction of recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Hoque A; Lippman SM; Boiko IV; Atkinson EN; Sneige N; Sahin A; Weber DM; Risin S; Lagios MD; Schwarting R; Colburn WJ; Dhingra K; Follen M; Kelloff GJ; Boone CW; Hittelman WN
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Mar; 10(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 11303595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Morphological abstraction of thyroid tumor cell nuclei using morphometry with factor analysis.
Murata S; Mochizuki K; Nakazawa T; Kondo T; Nakamura N; Yamashita H; Urata Y; Ashihara T; Katoh R
Microsc Res Tech; 2003 Aug; 61(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 12845572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of quantitative and semiquantitative methods of assessing MIB-1 with the S-phase fraction in breast carcinoma.
MacGrogan G; Jollet I; Huet S; Sierankowski G; Picot V; Bonichon F; Coindre JM
Mod Pathol; 1997 Aug; 10(8):769-76. PubMed ID: 9267818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nuclear shape and axillary metastases in breast cancer. Analytic morphometry of aspiration smears.
Giardina C; Ricco R; Serio G; Vacca E; Pennella A; Renzulli G; Punzo C; Borzacchini AM; Delfino VP
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 8191823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identification of a low-risk group of stage I breast cancer patients by cytometrically assessed DNA and nuclear texture parameters.
Aubele M; Auer G; Falkmer U; Voss A; Rodenacker K; Jütting U; Höfler H
J Pathol; 1995 Dec; 177(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 8568592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An image analysis study on nuclear morphology in metastasized and non-metastasized squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue.
Hannen EJ; van der Laak JA; Manni JJ; Pahlplatz MM; Freihofer HP; Slootweg PJ; Koole R; de Wilde PC
J Pathol; 1998 Jun; 185(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 9713344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Computer-linked image analysis of nuclear area: is there a use in diagnosis and grading of hepatocellular carcinoma?
Cheah PL; Looi LM
Malays J Pathol; 2007 Jun; 29(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 19105327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
