These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7258961)

  • 1. Automated perimetry in a neuro-ophthalmologic practice.
    Schindler S; McCrary JA
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1981 Jun; 13(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 7258961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical comparison of visual field testing between Goldmann-type manual perimetry and the Marco MT-336 automated perimeter.
    Jennings BJ; Drake SA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Dec; 62(12):914-22. PubMed ID: 1814984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
    Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Fieldmaster-200 computer perimeter: a comparative, controlled clinical study of its sensitivity and specificity in glaucomatous field defects (author's transl)].
    Krieglstein GK; Glaab E; Gramer E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1981 Nov; 179(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7040780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Matched comparison of Goldmann perimetry and automated two-zone suprathreshold Dicon perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
    Levy NS; Ellis E
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1985 Apr; 17(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 4004003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Vigabatrin and visual field defects. A Danish material with evaluation of different screening methods].
    Riise P; Fledelius HC; Rogvi-Hansen Bà
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(10):1034-8. PubMed ID: 12645411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Reliability of successive automated static perimetry].
    Wu JS; Wang DB; Wang JH
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Dec; 39(12):731-5. PubMed ID: 14769224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of diagnostic performance and fixation control of two automated perimeters.
    Asman P; Fingeret M
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):763-8. PubMed ID: 9635382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of manual Goldmann and automated static visual fields using the Dicon 2000 perimeter in the detection of chiasmal tumors.
    Wirtschafter JD; Coffman SM
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1984 Aug; 16(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 6497219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Perimetry of early glaucomatous visual fields defects. Comparative controlled study using the Goldman and Octopus perimeter].
    Krieglstein GK; Schrems W; Gramer E; Leydhecker W
    Buch Augenarzt; 1982; 90():23-33. PubMed ID: 7046882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of tendency-oriented perimetry and dynamic strategy in octopus perimetry as a screening tool in a clinical setting: a prospective study.
    Scherrer M; Fleischhauer JC; Helbig H; Johann Auf der Heide K; Sutter FK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):252-4. PubMed ID: 17458786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss.
    Nowomiejska K; Vonthein R; Paetzold J; Zagorski Z; Kardon R; Schiefer U
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1343-54. PubMed ID: 15996734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tilted disc syndrome may mimic false visual field deterioration.
    Vuori ML; Mäntyjärvi M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):622-5. PubMed ID: 18162059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Component perimetry: a fast method to detect visual field defects caused by brain lesions.
    Bachmann G; Fahle M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Sep; 41(10):2870-86. PubMed ID: 10967040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confrontation visual field techniques in the detection of anterior visual pathway lesions.
    Trobe JD; Acosta PC; Krischer JP; Trick GL
    Ann Neurol; 1981 Jul; 10(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 7271230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.