These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7259109)

  • 1. Evaluation of protein quality: comparison of single-point and multi-point assays.
    Benedetti PC; Tagliamonte B; Bises G; Gentili V; Spadoni MA
    Ann Nutr Metab; 1981; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 7259109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of protein quality: methodological considerations.
    Bender AE
    Proc Nutr Soc; 1982 Sep; 41(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 6757926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linear and nonlinear models for measuring protein nutritional quality.
    Phillips RD
    J Nutr; 1981 Jun; 111(6):1058-66. PubMed ID: 7241226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nutritional evaluation of protein from Clanis bilineata (Lepidoptera), an edible insect.
    Xia Z; Wu S; Pan S; Kim JM
    J Sci Food Agric; 2012 May; 92(7):1479-82. PubMed ID: 22189909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Criteria and markers for protein quality assessment - a review.
    Tome D
    Br J Nutr; 2012 Aug; 108 Suppl 2():S222-9. PubMed ID: 23107532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nutritional quality of rice protein compared with whole egg protein.
    Murata K; Nishikaze M; Tanaka M
    J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo); 1977; 23(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 874579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Nutritive value of dietary ribonucleic acid and its nucleosides for growing rats with a diet deficient in nonessential amino acid N. 1. Assessment of the amino acid status of rats].
    Greife HA
    Zentralbl Veterinarmed A; 1984 May; 31(4):269-79. PubMed ID: 6145271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Determination of the biological value of beef and rice proteins and their combinations].
    Volkova LD; Nam OI; Chernikov MP; Smetanina LB; Dakhundaridze VV
    Vopr Pitan; 1988; (2):55-9. PubMed ID: 3388811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of nutritional adequacy of the protein in dog foods by trials on growing rats.
    Hegedüs M; Fekete S; Solti L; Andrásofszky E; Pallós L
    Acta Vet Hung; 1998; 46(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 9704511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A biological assay modification with rats for evaluation of protein quality].
    Chávez JF; Pellett PL
    Arch Latinoam Nutr; 1982 Dec; 32(4):913-44. PubMed ID: 7186347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of two nonlinear models for describing intake-response relationships in higher organisms.
    Ware GO; Phillips RD; Parrish RS; Moon LC
    J Nutr; 1980 Apr; 110(4):765-70. PubMed ID: 7365545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A study of N/H2O ratios in Sprague-Dawley rats under variable conditions and its use for routine NPU determinations (author's transl)].
    Carnovale E; Benedetti PC; Ferro-Luzzi A; Spadoni MA
    S TA NU; 1975; 5(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 1243954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advantages and limitations of the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) as a method for evaluating protein quality in human diets.
    Schaafsma G
    Br J Nutr; 2012 Aug; 108 Suppl 2():S333-6. PubMed ID: 23107546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The utilization of protein from a low-protein diet as determined by limiting essential amino acids.
    Jabłoński E; Rafalski H
    Br J Nutr; 1984 Mar; 51(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 6704371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recent trends in protein methodology.
    Rao MN; Shurpalekar KS
    World Rev Nutr Diet; 1973; 17():150-63. PubMed ID: 4570424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Value of alkane-produced protein and three animal meals for growth and body nitrogen of meal worms (Tenebrio molitor L.)].
    Gnacadja PC
    Ann Nutr Aliment; 1975; 29(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 1227370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of the protein quality of Erythrina edulis (balú)].
    Pérez G; de Martínez C; Díaz E
    Arch Latinoam Nutr; 1979 Jun; 29(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 533329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protein quality evaluation in rats of typical diets for 4- to 6-year-old children from different socioeconomic areas living in Oaxaca, Mexico.
    Wyatt CJ; Tejas MA; Méndez RO; Valencia ME
    Ann Nutr Metab; 2001; 45(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 11244183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation of body nitrogen--body water ratio of Sprague-Dawley rats as a function of the dietary protein quality and quantity.
    Abbassy M; Hussein L; Arafa A; Morcos SR
    Z Ernahrungswiss; 1980 Mar; 19(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 7385917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of the quality of protein mixtures based on collagen and blood. Comparison of biological and chemical evaluation criteria in rats].
    Hühn W; Elmadfa I
    Nahrung; 1983; 27(10):929-37. PubMed ID: 6669175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.