BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7259611)

  • 21. Hydrogel contact lens cleaning with or without multi-enzymes. A prospective study.
    Nilsson SE; Lindh H
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1988 Feb; 66(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 2452551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of contact lens cleaners on lens parameters and surface quality of the Novalens.
    Clark SA; Bennett ES; Henry VA; Caroline PJ
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 8454833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deposits on hydrophilic 'bandage' lenses. A scanning electronmicroscopic and x-ray microanalytic study.
    Høvding G; Seland JH
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1984 Dec; 62(6):849-58. PubMed ID: 6524311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The efficacy of hydrophilic contact lens cleaning systems in removing protein deposits.
    Jung J; Rapp J
    CLAO J; 1993 Jan; 19(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 8453752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attachment of bacteria to soft contact lenses.
    Fowler SA; Greiner JV; Allansmith MR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1979 Apr; 97(4):659-60. PubMed ID: 426680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cleaning hydrophilic contact lenses: an overview.
    Eriksen S
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1975 Sep; 7(9):1223-6, 1229-32. PubMed ID: 1163929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Identification of proteins in contact lens surface deposits by immunofluorescence microscopy.
    Gudmundsson OG; Woodward DF; Fowler SA; Allansmith MR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1985 Feb; 103(2):196-7. PubMed ID: 3883966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Soft lens cleaners: their effectiveness in removing depostis.
    Hathaway RA; Lowther GE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1978 Mar; 49(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 649904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contact lens wear in an environment contaminated with metal particles.
    Nilsson SG; Lindh H; Andersson L
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1983 Oct; 61(5):882-8. PubMed ID: 6659896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [A testing method of assessing the protein-removing effect of the contact lenses' protein -removing care solution].
    Wen Y; Jia XH; He T
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 30(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 16830809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Defining the physiologically normal coating and pathological deposit: an analysis of sulfur-containing moieties and pellicle thickness on hydrogel contact lenses.
    Hart DE; Plociniak MP; Grimes GW
    CLAO J; 1998 Apr; 24(2):85-101. PubMed ID: 9571268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Isolation and identification of biologically active contaminants from soft contact lenses. I. Nicotine deposits on worn lenses.
    Broich JR; Weiss L; Rapp J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Nov; 19(11):1328-35. PubMed ID: 7429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Soft contact lens cleaning: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Hesse RJ; Kneisser G; Fukushima A; Yamaguchi T
    Contact Intraocul Lens Med J; 1982; 8(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 7075200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hyphal penetration of worn hydrogel contact lenses by Fusarium.
    Ahearn DG; Zhang S; Ward MA; Simmons RB; Stulting RD
    Cornea; 2009 Sep; 28(8):914-7. PubMed ID: 19654522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative study of lens solutions' ability to remove tear constituents.
    Cheung S; Lorentz H; Drolle E; Leonenko Z; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 91(9):1045-61. PubMed ID: 25105687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fungal growth on soft contact lenses: a SEM-study.
    Jongebloed WL; Humalda D; Worst JF
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1987; 67(1-2):119-28. PubMed ID: 3428091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Coatings on the surface of siloxane gas permeable lenses worn by keratoconic patients: a scanning electron microscope study.
    Fowler SA; Korb DR; Finnemore VM; Ross RN; Allansmith MR
    CLAO J; 1987; 13(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 3483327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of in vivo and in vitro surface protein deposits on the oxygen permeability of polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate gel contact lenses.
    Huth SW; Lannom CS; Lannom S
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Apr; 61(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 6731571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An analysis of nodular deposits on soft contact lenses.
    Begley CG; Waggoner PJ
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Mar; 62(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 1813524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A clinical evaluation of frequent replacement contact lenses on patients currently wearing premium reusable daily wear soft contact lenses.
    Nason RJ; Vogel H; Tarbell BJ; Yi FP; Mertz GW
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 8454836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.