These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Effects of rise-fall time, frequency, and intensity on the early/middle evoked response. Beattie RC; Moretti M; Warren V J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 May; 49(2):114-27. PubMed ID: 6716983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials]. Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short latency somatosensory and spinal evoked potentials: power spectra and comparison between high pass analog and digital filter. Maccabee PJ; Hassan NF; Cracco RQ; Schiff JA Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 2420570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of high-pass filter frequency and slope on BAEP amplitude, latency and wave form. Elton M; Scherg M; Von Cramon D Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 May; 57(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 6201344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory brainstem responses to middle- and low-frequency tone pips. Maurizi M; Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Rosignoli M Audiology; 1984; 23(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 6704061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip. Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The brainstem auditory evoked potential: effects of high frequency filtering. Shaw NA Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 2351091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of low pass filtering on the brainstem auditory evoked potential in the rat. Shaw NA Exp Brain Res; 1987; 65(3):686-90. PubMed ID: 3556497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem responses in the cat. Mair IW; Laukli E Acta Otolaryngol; 1985; 99(3-4):377-83. PubMed ID: 4013727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Portions of tone pips contributing to frequency-selective auditory brain stem responses. Kodera K; Marsh RR; Suzuki M; Suzuki J Audiology; 1983; 22(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 6870663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bilateral recording of early auditory evoked responses in the cat. Mair IW; Elverland HH; Laukli E Hear Res; 1978 Oct; 1(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 757228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The auditory brain stem response recorded with 60 Hz notch filters. Marsh RR Ear Hear; 1991 Apr; 12(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 2065842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maximum length sequences -- a fast method for measuring brain-stem-evoked responses. Eysholdt U; Schreiner C Audiology; 1982; 21(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 7092727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]