These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7261331)

  • 1. Design and evaluation of statistical control procedures: applications of a computer "quality control simulator" program.
    Westgard JO; Groth T
    Clin Chem; 1981 Sep; 27(9):1536-45. PubMed ID: 7261331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An interactive computer simulation program for the design of statistical control procedures in clinical chemistry.
    Groth T; Falk H; Westgard JO
    Comput Programs Biomed; 1981; 13(1-2):73-86. PubMed ID: 7285568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quality control simulator for design and evaluation of internal quality control procedures.
    Groth T; Falk H; Westgard JO
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():195-201. PubMed ID: 6599523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control: probabilities for false rejection and error detection.
    Westgard JO; Groth T; Aronsson T; Falk H; de Verdier CH
    Clin Chem; 1977 Oct; 23(10):1857-67. PubMed ID: 902411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A tool for the design and evaluation of alternative quality-control procedures.
    Hatjimihail AT
    Clin Chem; 1992 Feb; 38(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 1541001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer evaluation of statistical procedures, and a new quality-control statistical procedure.
    Blum AS
    Clin Chem; 1985 Feb; 31(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 3967350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of a between-run component of variation, choice of control limits, and shape of error distribution on the performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control.
    Westgard JO; Falk H; Groth T
    Clin Chem; 1979 Mar; 25(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 262178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nested control procedures for internal analytical quality control. Theoretical design and practical evaluation.
    Aronsson T; Groth T
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():51-64. PubMed ID: 6599530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Error models and quality control performance.
    Chiecchio A; Malvano R
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1996 May; 34(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 8790978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of medically useful quality-control procedures for individual tests done in a multitest analytical system.
    Koch DD; Oryall JJ; Quam EF; Feldbruegge DH; Dowd DE; Barry PL; Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1990 Feb; 36(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 2302766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent increases in random error.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1992 Mar; 38(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 1547553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multirule quality control procedures.
    Carey RN
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 1809061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent systematic error.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1992 Mar; 38(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 1547552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. QC Validator 2.0: a computer program for automatic selection of statistical QC procedures for applications in healthcare laboratories.
    Westgard JO; Stein B; Westgard SA; Kennedy R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1997 Jul; 53(3):175-86. PubMed ID: 9230452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power functions for statistical control rules.
    Westgard JO; Groth T
    Clin Chem; 1979 Jun; 25(6):863-9. PubMed ID: 445821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selecting multi-rule quality control procedures based on patient risk.
    Bayat H
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(11):1702-1708. PubMed ID: 28236626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selecting Statistical Quality Control Procedures for Limiting the Impact of Increases in Analytical Random Error on Patient Safety.
    Yago M
    Clin Chem; 2017 May; 63(5):1022-1030. PubMed ID: 28302731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matrix effects and the performance and selection of quality-control procedures to monitor PO2 measurements.
    Olafsdottir E; Westgard JO; Ehrmeyer SS; Fallon KD
    Clin Chem; 1996 Mar; 42(3):392-6. PubMed ID: 8598101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the performance characteristics of quality-control procedures when error persists until detection.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1991 Oct; 37(10 Pt 1):1720-4. PubMed ID: 1914171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New insight into the comparative power of quality-control rules that use control observations within a single analytical run.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1993 Mar; 39(3):440-7. PubMed ID: 8448854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.