These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7261331)

  • 21. Charts of operational process specifications ("OPSpecs charts") for assessing the precision, accuracy, and quality control needed to satisfy proficiency testing performance criteria.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1226-33; discussion 1245-50. PubMed ID: 1623586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance characteristics of several rules for self-interpretation of proficiency testing data.
    Carey RN; Cembrowski GS; Garber CC; Zaki Z
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):997-1003. PubMed ID: 16048412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genetic algorithms-based design and optimization of statistical quality-control procedures.
    Hatjimihail AT
    Clin Chem; 1993 Sep; 39(9):1972-8. PubMed ID: 8375083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Principles for developing improved quality control procedures.
    Westgard JO; Groth T; de Verdier CH
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():19-41. PubMed ID: 6599521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Choosing quality-control systems to detect maximum clinically allowable analytical errors.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem; 1989 Feb; 35(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 2914374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) rule compared with traditionally used quality control rules.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 16599831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Combined Shewhart-cusum control chart for improved quality control in clinical chemistry.
    Westgard JO; Groth T; Aronsson T; de Verdier CH
    Clin Chem; 1977 Oct; 23(10):1881-7. PubMed ID: 902415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A quality control program to evaluate accuracy and precision of clinical chemistry determinations.
    Limonard CB
    Clin Chim Acta; 1979 Jul; 95(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 527225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The quality-costs of an analytical process: 1. Development of quality-costs models based on predictive value theory.
    Westgard JO; Hyltoft Petersen P; Groth T
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():221-7. PubMed ID: 6599527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of 3 options for choosing control limits in biochemistry testing.
    Manzocchi S; Furman E; Freeman K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2017 Mar; 46(1):120-125. PubMed ID: 28165632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relationship of quality goals and measurement performance to the selection of quality control procedures for multi-channel haematology analysers.
    Westgard JO; Cembrowski GS
    Eur J Haematol Suppl; 1990; 53():14-8. PubMed ID: 2279549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Proposed guidelines for the internal quality control of analytical results in the medical laboratory.
    Petersen PH; Ricós C; Stöckl D; Libeer JC; Baadenhuijsen H; Fraser C; Thienpont L
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1996 Dec; 34(12):983-99. PubMed ID: 8986407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The detection of problem analytes in a single proficiency test challenge in the absence of the Health Care Financing Administration rule violations.
    Cembrowski GS; Hackney JR; Carey N
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 8466413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Internal quality control system for non-stationary, non-ergodic analytical processes based upon exponentially weighted estimation of process means and process standard deviation.
    Jansen RT; Laeven M; Kardol W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2002 Jun; 40(6):616-24. PubMed ID: 12211659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laboratory quality control: using patient data to assess analytical performance.
    Kazmierczak SC
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 May; 41(5):617-27. PubMed ID: 12812257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term retrospective control procedures for monitoring analytical performance of laboratory instruments.
    Gozzo ML; Barbaresi G; Giocoli G; Zappacosta B; Zuppi C
    Clin Chem; 1984 Jan; 30(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 6690124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of quality control materials on the performance of an internal quality control system: 1. General considerations.
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Hørder M; Blaabjerg O; Jørgensen PJ
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():65-9. PubMed ID: 6599531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of current National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for total cholesterol triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol measurements.
    Caudill SP; Cooper GR; Smith SJ; Myers GL
    Clin Chem; 1998 Aug; 44(8 Pt 1):1650-8. PubMed ID: 9702951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Thoughts on quality-control systems: a laboratorian's perspective.
    Cembrowski GS
    Clin Chem; 1997 May; 43(5):886-92. PubMed ID: 9166258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computer systems for implementation of internal quality control procedures.
    Westgard JO; Groth T
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():203-7. PubMed ID: 6599524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.