113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7261669)
1. Cutaneous reactions to petrolatum.
Fisher AA
Cutis; 1981 Jul; 28(1):23-4, 31, 57 passim. PubMed ID: 7261669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Positive reactions to patch test with cosmetics].
Hayakawa R; Kobayashi M; Kawase A; Hojo T; Adachi A
Nihon Rinsho; 1977 Aug; 35(8):2675-8. PubMed ID: 926362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing.
Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dimethyl sulfoxide as a vehicle for food allergy patch tests.
Fisher AA
Cutis; 1985 Aug; 36(2):109-10. PubMed ID: 4028825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patch testing with primin in white petrolatum.
Schubert HJ; Prater E; Sell M
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):286. PubMed ID: 4085239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitization to petrolatum: an unusual cause of false-positive drug patch-tests.
Ulrich G; Schmutz JL; Trechot P; Commun N; Barbaud A
Allergy; 2004 Sep; 59(9):1006-9. PubMed ID: 15291911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Skin tests in the study of primary irritancy of various components of detergents].
Moskalewska K; Olak E; Polkowska M
Przegl Dermatol; 1978; 65(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 725098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nystatin allergy. Petrolatum is not the optimal vehicle for patch testing.
de Groot AC; Conemans JM
Dermatol Clin; 1990 Jan; 8(1):153-5. PubMed ID: 2302855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. General considerations for skin test procedures in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity.
Brockow K; Romano A; Blanca M; Ring J; Pichler W; Demoly P
Allergy; 2002 Jan; 57(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 11991289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of suitable concentrations for patch testing of various fragrance materials. A summary of a group study conducted over a 6-year period. Mid-Japan Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
J Dermatol; 1984 Feb; 11(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 6376573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Batch variations.
Calnan CD
Dermatol Clin; 1990 Jan; 8(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 2302860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitization to yellow petrolatum used as a vehicle for patch testing.
Dooms-Goossens A; Degreef H
Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jan; 6(2):146-7. PubMed ID: 7398273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. I. Experimental contact sensitization in humans.
Marzulli FN; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 1032125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patch testing with hexavalent chromium salts in different vehicles and with nickel and cobalt in petrolatum.
Samsoen M; Stampf JL; Lelièvre G; Foussereau J
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1982; 30(6):181-4. PubMed ID: 6218976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patch tests with some spices.
Bruynzeel DP; Prevoo RL
Dermatol Clin; 1990 Jan; 8(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 2302865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of hypoallergenicity of ten skincare products.
Brandt S; Lio P
J Drugs Dermatol; 2014 Mar; 13(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 24595569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of colophony patch test preparations.
Karlberg AT; Lidén C
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Mar; 18(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 3365969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the compatibility between aluminium Finn Chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum.
Lachapelle JM; Douka MA
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1985; 33(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3987516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Water versus petrolatum for testing imidazolidinyl urea.
Foussereau J; Cavelier C
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jul; 21(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 2805661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patch testing for adverse drug reactions.
Sekhon S; Nedorost ST
Cutis; 2017 Jan; 99(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28207004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
