These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7264245)

  • 1. Adult age differences in visual search as a function of stimulus mapping and processing load.
    Plude DJ; Hoyer WJ
    J Gerontol; 1981 Sep; 36(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 7264245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual-memory search: an integrative perspective.
    Cousineau D; Larochelle S
    Psychol Res; 2004 Dec; 69(1-2):77-105. PubMed ID: 14986138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consistent and varied memory/visual search: is there an interaction between age and response-set effects?
    Fisk AD; Rogers WA; Giambra LM
    J Gerontol; 1990 May; 45(3):P81-7. PubMed ID: 2335729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search.
    Anderson EJ; Mannan SK; Rees G; Sumner P; Kennard C
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):301-12. PubMed ID: 25116297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhanced visual detection in trait anxiety.
    Berggren N; Blonievsky T; Derakshan N
    Emotion; 2015 Aug; 15(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 26214571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behind the scenes: how visual memory load biases selective attention during processing of visual streams.
    Klaver P; Talsma D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1133-46. PubMed ID: 24015992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic and controlled attention processes in auditory target detection.
    Poltrock SE; Lansman M; Hunt E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Feb; 8(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 6460083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do ability-performance relationships differentiate age and practice effects in visual search?
    Rogers WA; Fisk AD; Hertzog C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 May; 20(3):710-38. PubMed ID: 8207376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age, response complexity, and target consistency in visual search.
    Plude DJ; Hoyer WJ; Lazar J
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 7128660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the development of automatic processing: an application of dual-task and event-related brain potential methodologies.
    Kramer AF; Strayer DL
    Biol Psychol; 1988 Jun; 26(1-3):231-67. PubMed ID: 3207785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond a mask and against the bottleneck: retroactive dual-task interference during working memory consolidation of a masked visual target.
    Nieuwenstein M; Wyble B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1409-1427. PubMed ID: 24364683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An exemplar-familiarity model predicts short-term and long-term probe recognition across diverse forms of memory search.
    Nosofsky RM; Cox GE; Cao R; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1524-39. PubMed ID: 24749963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuous performance test and schizophrenia: a test of stimulus-response compatibility, working memory, response readiness, or none of the above?
    Elvevåg B; Weinberger DR; Suter JC; Goldberg TE
    Am J Psychiatry; 2000 May; 157(5):772-80. PubMed ID: 10784471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aging and performance on an everyday-based visual search task.
    Potter LM; Grealy MA; Elliott MA; Andrés P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jul; 140(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 22664318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Searching while loaded: Visual working memory does not interfere with hybrid search efficiency but hybrid search uses working memory capacity.
    Drew T; Boettcher SE; Wolfe JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):201-12. PubMed ID: 26055755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age related differences in learning with the useful field of view.
    Richards E; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4217-31. PubMed ID: 17027061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of constant target sets in visual search tasks.
    Holmes DL; Olsho LW; Peper R; Schulte A; Green P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 1):803-8. PubMed ID: 740473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improvement in visual search with practice: mapping learning-related changes in neurocognitive stages of processing.
    Clark K; Appelbaum LG; van den Berg B; Mitroff SR; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 35(13):5351-9. PubMed ID: 25834059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The visual attentional blink reflects constraints on temporal visual processing, not just a lapse of visual memory.
    Gillard-Crewther S; Lawson ML; Bello K; Crewther DP
    Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Jul; 90(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 17535367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.