These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7264879)

  • 1. Cross-modal physiological effects of electrodermal lability in the detection of deception.
    Waid WM; Wilson SK; Orne MT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1981 Jun; 40(6):1118-25. PubMed ID: 7264879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meprobamate reduces accuracy of physiological detection of deception.
    Waid WM; Orne EC; Cook MR; Orne MT
    Science; 1981 Apr; 212(4490):71-3. PubMed ID: 7209522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrodermal lability and myocardial reactivity to stress.
    Kelsey RM
    Psychophysiology; 1991 Nov; 28(6):619-31. PubMed ID: 1816589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in electrodermal lability and the detection of information and deception.
    Waid WM; Orne MT
    J Appl Psychol; 1980 Feb; 65(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7364702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrodermal lability and simple reaction time.
    Wilson KG
    Biol Psychol; 1987 Jun; 24(3):275-89. PubMed ID: 3663801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of biofeedback on the detection of deception.
    Timm HW
    J Forensic Sci; 1987 May; 32(3):736-46. PubMed ID: 3598524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temperature effects on polygraph detection of concealed information.
    MacNeill AL; Bradley MT
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 26435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrodermal lability and visual information processing.
    Wilson KG; Graham RS
    Psychophysiology; 1989 May; 26(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 2756081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrodermal lability: individual differences affecting perceptual speed and vigilance performance in 9 to 16 year-old children.
    Sakai LM; Baker LA; Dawson ME
    Psychophysiology; 1992 Mar; 29(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 1635963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychophysiological differentiation of deception: the effects of electrodermal lability and mode of responding on skin conductance and heart rate.
    Gödert HW; Rill HG; Vossel G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2001 Feb; 40(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 11166108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality and electrodermal response lability: an interpretation.
    Crider A
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2008 Sep; 33(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 18509756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can simultaneously acquired electrodermal activity improve accuracy of fMRI detection of deception?
    Kozel FA; Johnson KA; Laken SJ; Grenesko EL; Smith JA; Walker J; George MS
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 18633826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The roles of deception, intention to deceive, and motivation to avoid detection in the psychophysiological detection of guilty knowledge.
    Furedy JJ; Ben-Shakhar G
    Psychophysiology; 1991 Mar; 28(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 1946882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orienting versus inhibition in the Concealed Information Test: Different cognitive processes drive different physiological measures.
    klein Selle N; Verschuere B; Kindt M; Meijer E; Ben-Shakhar G
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Apr; 53(4):579-90. PubMed ID: 26615984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Act of Answering Questions Elicited Differentiated Responses in a Concealed Information Test.
    Otsuka T; Mizutani M; Yagi A; Katayama J
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1769-1775. PubMed ID: 29665043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
    Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of repeated psychophysiological detection of deception testing.
    Dollins AB; Cestaro VL; Pettit DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 9729818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The measurement of electrodermal activity].
    Grapperon J; Pignol AC; Vion-Dury J
    Encephale; 2012 Apr; 38(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 22516273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrodermal differentiation of deception: the effect of choice versus no choice of deceptive items.
    Furedy JJ; Gigliotti F; Ben-Shakhar G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 Oct; 18(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 7876035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrodermal lability, errors, and reaction times: an examination of the motor impulsivity hypothesis.
    Vossel G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1988 Mar; 6(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 3372270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.