These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7267718)

  • 21. The effect of local speaking rate on the perception of quantity in Estonian.
    Traunmüller H; Krull D
    Phonetica; 2003; 60(3):187-207. PubMed ID: 14571060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distribution of acoustic cues for stop consonant place of articulation in VCV syllables.
    Dorman MF; Raphael LJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Apr; 67(4):1333-5. PubMed ID: 7372920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Limits on the limitations of context-conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and [w].
    Miller JL; Wayland SC
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Aug; 54(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 8361836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: a distinction between lexical status and speaking rate.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 11521848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Phonetic perception: evidence for context-dependent and context-independent processing.
    Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 69(3):822-31. PubMed ID: 7240563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dynamic information in the identification and discrimination of vowels.
    Fox RA
    Phonetica; 1989; 46(1-3):97-116. PubMed ID: 2608728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Articulatory-rate context effects in phoneme identification.
    Kidd GR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):736-48. PubMed ID: 2531208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Phonetic coherence in duplex perception: effects of acoustic differences and lexical status.
    Nygaard LC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):268-286. PubMed ID: 8473839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The phonetic landscape in infant consonant perception is an uneven terrain.
    Nam Y; Polka L
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():57-66. PubMed ID: 27352133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cognitive-perceptual examination of remediation approaches to hypokinetic dysarthria.
    McAuliffe MJ; Kerr SE; Gibson EM; Anderson T; LaShell PJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1268-83. PubMed ID: 24687031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rise time and formant transition duration in the discrimination of speech sounds: the Ba-Wa distinction in developmental dyslexia.
    Goswami U; Fosker T; Huss M; Mead N; Szucs D
    Dev Sci; 2011 Jan; 14(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 21159086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of /w/-/v/ speech and nonspeech.
    Iverson P; Wagner A; Pinet M; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL297-303. PubMed ID: 22088031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acoustic and speaker variation in Dutch /n/ and /m/ as a function of phonetic context and syllabic position.
    Smorenburg L; Heeren W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):979. PubMed ID: 34470278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acoustic analysis of lexical tone in Mandarin infant-directed speech.
    Liu HM; Tsao FM; Kuhl PK
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Jul; 43(4):912-7. PubMed ID: 17605524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cues for lexical tone perception in children: acoustic correlates and phonetic context effects.
    Tong X; McBride C; Burnham D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1589-605. PubMed ID: 24817506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentional modulation of the phonetic significance of acoustic cues.
    Gordon PC; Eberhardt JL; Rueckl JG
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Jan; 25(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 8425384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of lexical neighbors on stop consonant articulation.
    Goldrick M; Vaughn C; Murphy A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL172-7. PubMed ID: 23927221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks.
    Stager CL; Werker JF
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6640):381-2. PubMed ID: 9237755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Children hear the forest.
    Nittrouer S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):1799-802. PubMed ID: 17069277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.