These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7267850)

  • 41. [Frequency and presentation of somatic brain damage criteria in risk children].
    Meyer-Probst B; Cammann G; Engel H; Heider B; Kleinpeter U; Teichmann H
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1980 May; 32(5):257-67. PubMed ID: 7413859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Results of a training program to improve the speed of visual perception and concentration in brain-damaged patients].
    Sturm W; Dahmen W; Hartje W; Willmes K
    Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970); 1983; 233(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 6860125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Psychometric and clinical test-retest reliability of the Halstead impairment index in a sample of healthy, young, normal men.
    Matarazzo JD; Wiens AN; Matarazzo RG; Goldstein SG
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1974 Jan; 158(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 4809533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Diagnosis of "disturbed psychological behavior and organic brain damage" using the Rorschach test (Ro 30)].
    Bottenberg EH
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 1968 Apr; 17(3):82-7. PubMed ID: 5716028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Interdependence of percepts and concepts as a primary differential diagnostic problem].
    Ahrens HJ; Stäcker KH
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1970 Dec; 122(3):259-79. PubMed ID: 5517196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Correlation between Halstead Impairment Index and Average Impairment Rating.
    Dye OA; Saxon SA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 2):1030. PubMed ID: 745874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A further attempt to cross-validate the Russell, Neuringer, and Goldstein neuropsychological keys.
    Goldstein G; Shelly C
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1982 Oct; 50(5):721-6. PubMed ID: 7142546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The use of the sensory-perceptual examination in diagnosis of degree of impairment of higher cerebral functions.
    Grundvig JL; Needham WE; Ajax ET; Beck EC
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1970 Aug; 151(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 5457616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Speed and learning in the diagnosis of diffuse brain damage in elderly subjects: a Bayesian statistical approach.
    Kendrick DC
    Br J Soc Clin Psychol; 1965 Jun; 4(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 5872718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Four common tests of brain damage compared.
    Loiselle RH; Young KM; McDonald MM
    Psychiatr Commun; 1968; 10(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 5735263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A validity study of the Hooper Visual Organization Test.
    Boyd JL
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1981 Feb; 49(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 7217472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of frequency of abnormal results in neuropsychological vs. neurodiagnostic procedures.
    Snow WG
    J Clin Psychol; 1981 Jan; 37(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 7204604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A further analysis of the Block Rotation Test.
    Lawriw I; Sutker LW
    J Clin Psychol; 1978 Oct; 34(4):930-4. PubMed ID: 711886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cross-validation of the Canter Background Interference Procedure in identifying children with cerebral dysfunction.
    Adams J; Kenny TJ
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1982 Apr; 50(2):307-9. PubMed ID: 7069038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of experience and amount of information on identification of cerebral impairment.
    Goldstein SG; Kleinknecht RA; Deysach RE
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1973 Aug; 41(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 4726707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Visual perception: an overview.
    Breger D
    Am J Occup Ther; 1968; 22(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 5648921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [QUALITATIVE DATA OF THE BOURDON-WIERSMA TEST].
    VAN DER VEN AH
    Ned Tijdschr Psychol; 1965 Apr; 20():219-27. PubMed ID: 14343963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Methodological considerations on the Bourdon-Wiersma stipple test.
    van WULFFTEN PALTHE P
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Neurochir Neerl; 1959; 62():397-401. PubMed ID: 13846210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of two scoring systems for the Memory-For-Designs Test.
    Rosen H
    J Clin Psychol; 1971 Jan; 27(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 5539333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Various aspects of the Bourdon-Wiersma test].
    NAS J
    Ned Tijdschr Psychol; 1961; 16():360-80. PubMed ID: 14478416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.