These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7269043)
61. Instructions and techniques for reliable audiometric tests. Morrill JC Occup Health Saf; 1984 Sep; 53(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 6504432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Deterioration of noise-induced hearing loss among bottling factory workers. Ologe FE; Olajide TG; Nwawolo CC; Oyejola BA J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Aug; 122(8):786-94. PubMed ID: 17666128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [Is otoacoustic emission useful in the differential diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing loss?]. Sliwińska-Kowalska M; Kotylo P Med Pr; 1997; 48(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 9558629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Noise and hearing loss in firefighting. Tubbs RL Occup Med; 1995; 10(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 8903753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Leading work-related diseases and injuries--United States. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1986 Mar; 35(12):185-8. PubMed ID: 3081789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. [Tests of auditory fatigue and their possible use in the prevention of occupational hypoacusia: apropos of a clinical case]. Perria M; Moscolin M; Pardini L; Bonsignore AD; Cervoni E; Salami A G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2001; 23(4 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 11822308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. [Changes in the auditory organ in mill operators of Ore Dressiny factories in Krivoi Rog basin as influenced by industrial noise and vibration]. Ivanov AS Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1972; 32(4):105. PubMed ID: 5080220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. [Our audiometric criteria for the prevention of occupational hearing disorders]. Tománek R; Sedlmajerová D Cesk Otolaryngol; 1983 Jul; 32(4):230-8. PubMed ID: 6627462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. [Hardness of hearing due to noise of the ship engine personnel]. Nowak R; Dahl D Z Gesamte Hyg; 1971 Jul; 17(7):488-92. PubMed ID: 5122575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Noise-induced hearing loss among U.S. Air Force cryptolinguists. Ritter DC; Perkins JL Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Jun; 72(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 11398819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. [Occupational hearing disorders due to noise]. Baldus S ZFA (Stuttgart); 1976 Nov; 52(32):1653-9. PubMed ID: 1020426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emission in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss. Kowalska S; Sułkowski W Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1997; 10(4):441-59. PubMed ID: 9575669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Health surveillance for noise-induced hearing loss. Forshaw C; Sen D Occup Med (Lond); 2011 Mar; 61(2):137. PubMed ID: 21355033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. [Hearing in workers under 30 years of age after 10 years' work in a noisy environment]. Marková M Cesk Otolaryngol; 1987 Jul; 36(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 3664700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss: the first two cases compensated in India. Murlidhar V; Kanhere V Natl Med J India; 1998; 11(3):150. PubMed ID: 9707710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Methodological issues when comparing hearing thresholds of a group with population standards: the case of the ferry engineers. Dobie RA Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):526-37. PubMed ID: 16957502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]